Men are placed in the most high-level jobs. some people say that the government should encourage a certain percentage of these jobs to be reserved for women do you agree or disagree?
Indeed, the majority of top-level positions are occupied by male candidates in every sector. Many are favoring that some amount of quotas ought to be kept for women aspirants. I am completely agreed with the notion because women in work culture would definitely foster the advantages to the society.
To begin with, in this era, wherein the sense of women empowerment is spread over the world, it would fulfill the primary aim of its mission, if women lead any sectors successfully. In addition, more and more female candidates would be encouraged to become self-sustainable, to give a helping hand in the family income, when only one source of income is least sufficient in this inflated market. Actually, there have been stated examples of narrated situations in real. For such reasons, few seats must be pre-allocated to women in the corporate sectors.
Women had saved many firms from collapsation through her management skills in history. Undoubtedly, God has graced females with superlative adjustment skills. They are definitely good managers, whether it is a home or a country. Indira Gandhi, for instance, controlled the nation extremely well particularly during the Kargil war between India and Pakistan. Moreover, the presence of a female in the workplace deliberately reduces the chance of conflicts among the employees and taking the wrong decision regarding the firm. These how such perspectives force one to think in the direction of women's reservation in the job.
It is a continuously ongoing debate, whether to provide certain reservations to women in the top-level position or not when the current trend is larger dominated by men. In conclusion, I am totally in favor of allocating few seats in higher authorities to women, as the action would certainly bring fruitful benefits to society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-04 | dhruv j patel | 61 | view |
| 2021-07-04 | dhruv j patel | 61 | view |
- Fossil fuels (coal, oil, natural gas) are the main resources in many nations, but in some countries, the use of alternative sources of energy (wind and solar energy) is encouraged. To what extent do you think it is a positive or negative development? 84
- Many people who leave school hold a negative attitude towards learning. Why does this happen? How to solve the problem? 78
- Question: In some countries, some of the criminal cases in the law courts are shown on the television, so that the public can watch them. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 89
- Children are taught to push themselves to try and be better than their classmates rather than work together for everyone s profit Do you think the advantages outweigh its disadvantages 65
- History tells that people have afternoon thought about creating and ideal society but most of the times fail in making this happen What is your opinion about an ideal society how can we create an ideal society 39
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 526, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this how' or 'These hows'?
Suggestion: This how; These hows
... the wrong decision regarding the firm. These how such perspectives force one to think in...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, if, moreover, regarding, so, well, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1534.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27147766323 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95336784774 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.652920962199 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.3282350074 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.266666667 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185858480565 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0544974940562 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0513839874171 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108717104651 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0261074829667 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.9 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.