Do the advantages of having closed circuit television outweigh the disadvantages?
In recent years, it is fact that CCTV has become one of the most important tools for living security in which more and more housing estates install the high-tech device with a view to protecting the citizens life. Despite some obvious disadvantages of CCTV, I would agree that these are outweighed by the advantages.
On the one hand, it is clear that CCTV would bring about several negative aspects. One compelling evidence is that it would pay an exorbitant installation cost. For example, some families, who are in the lower brackets of income can not pay for this video cameras. In other words, the citizens will deal with the instruction of privacy. Although they will be comfortable in the beginning time, they will feel hesitant to enjoy their daily life because each activity will be recorded by monitoring systems. Last but not least, the high-tech security network is likely to be exposed to cyber crime; for instance, some hackers will misuse footage or data that have contained in CCTV for various dangerous purposes.
On the other hand, I argue that there are more positive aspects of CCTV. First, they facilitate the effective security for people. Because every time the crimes like hand pockets, robbers, etc want to jog on some bad behaviors and they see the high-tech security, they will feel discouraged and deny their action. Second, these devices can help us to reduce the number of security staffs; therefore, we can save a wide range of expenditure and we will use it for another purposes like investment more national article or renew the infrastructure. Finally, the records from video cameras are one of the most useful evidences to boost crimes into the prison.
In conclusion, there are downsides to install CCTV. However, it seems to me that the merits would be more important regarding the efficient security, the decrease of security staffs expenses and the most useful evidences to incriminate the crimes.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-11-17 | zanzendegi | 73 | view |
2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
2024-11-06 | nhatkhang111 | 78 | view |
2024-10-24 | linh allie | 89 | view |
2024-10-24 | linh allie | 84 | view |
- Do the advantages of using networks at work outweigh the disadvantages? 84
- Children watch too much television nowadays and this is bad for their education and development How far do you agree with this statement 95
- Do the advantages of having closed circuit television outweigh the disadvantages 56
- Children should always follow their parents' advice. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 73
- Effects And Solutions to Global Warming 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 200, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'citizens'' or 'citizen's'?
Suggestion: citizens'; citizen's
...ch device with a view to protecting the citizens life. Despite some obvious disadvantage...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 249, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ul evidences to incriminate the crimes.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, regarding, second, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1623.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02476780186 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59908918578 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572755417957 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 522.0 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.4865477609 49.4020404114 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.2 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5333333333 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.53333333333 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0254679931159 0.244688304435 10% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0108394114299 0.084324248473 13% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.032351533504 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0192145777988 0.151304729494 13% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.025075455347 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.