spending money by government on basic needs
The importance of spending money by government on basic needs which was always debatable has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is beneficial while others reject this notion. The substantial influence of this trend has sparked the controversy over the potential impact in recent years. In my opinion, the former proposition appears to be more rational. This essay will further elaborate my views for favoring the positive impact of this trend and will lead to a logical conclusion
There are myriad of reasons which will further elaborate this argument but the most preponderant one stems from the fact that government should invest money in improving mediocre technology .Needless to say, all these merits stand in a good stead.
Elaborating my viewpoint, there are some more merits but one of the crucial effects is that science and technology is very importance other people think money spend on more basis need. Hence, it is apparent why many are against favor of this trend .
According to the argu8ments aforementioned above, one reach to a conclusion that the benefits of they should their education sector because it is considered as the base of overall development of a particular country are indeed too great to ignore.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-13 | manraj123 | 77 | view |
| 2019-12-13 | manraj123 | 77 | view |
| 2019-12-13 | Deepkaur123 | 80 | view |
| 2019-09-06 | Dinuka Dissanayaje | 55 | view |
| 2019-08-28 | harpreet hundal | 75 | view |
- Some people think technology helps us save time but others believe wastes our time. 55
- information available online so library books 77
- public place 77
- Que You need to study climate change Which aspect of climate change will you choose and why 82
- while artificial intelligence becomes so advanced people can use computers to translate foreign languages 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 68, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...money by government on basic needs which was always debatable has now become more...
^^
Line 1, column 511, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd and will lead to a logical conclusion There are myriad of reasons which will f...
^^^^
Line 3, column 190, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...t money in improving mediocre technology .Needless to say, all these merits stand ...
^^
Line 3, column 192, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Needless
...money in improving mediocre technology .Needless to say, all these merits stand in a goo...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 248, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...why many are against favor of this trend . According to the argu8ments aforemen...
^^
Line 7, column 249, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...country are indeed too great to ignore.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, so, while, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 31.9359605911 85% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1062.0 1207.87684729 88% => OK
No of words: 205.0 242.827586207 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18048780488 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.92707691288 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76073214964 2.71678728327 102% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 139.433497537 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.629268292683 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 335.7 379.143842365 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 12.6551724138 55% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.5024630542 141% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 103.943666061 50.4703680194 206% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 151.714285714 104.977214359 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.2857142857 20.9669160288 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.14285714286 7.25397266985 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.33497536946 112% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204909772871 0.242375264174 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0831592972792 0.0925447433944 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121773596541 0.071462118173 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105179447917 0.151781067708 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0673089396907 0.0609392437508 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 12.6369458128 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 53.1260098522 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.36 11.5310837438 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.32886699507 113% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 55.0591133005 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.3980295567 131% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.