Some people believe that it is wrong to keep animals in zoos, while others think that zoos are both entertaining and ecologically important.
Discuss both views.
On the one hand, capturing animals is irrational due to some reasons. Firstly, it is cruel to cage animals in jars because human beings have no right to seizure them for creativity or experiment demand. If we put animals in cages, they will lose their instincts of hunting prey or alerting predators, which leads to the disappearance of some wild animals’ outstanding features. Besides, using animals in laboratories is unethical because they also have feelings as a human does. It is believed that instead of installing botanic zoos for entertaining, governments should spend their budgets on innovating their infrastructures, which enhances residents’ living conditions.
On the other hand, it is fundamental to keep animals in zoos to keep ecological balance and some other benefits as well. The situation is that more and more species are in danger of extinction, building more zoos and national reserves to prevent those creatures from being disappeared is paramount of importance. Caging in zoos, a wide range of species, especially rare animals, can have more chances to survive and breed due to the detrimental supplement of foods, medical treatment as well as safe accommodation. In addition, botanic zoos bring a lot of commercial benefits of a country. For example, Saigon zoo and botanic garden, attracting thousands of visitors annually, have been motivating tourism in Vietnamese, which helps to gain a significant budget and boost the economy.
In conclusion, although some people claimed that sending animals to zoos is wrong, many other opinions holding animals in zoos is rational since the requirements of maintaining the ecological system and entertainment are extremely essential.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | anhoanguyenquin | 56 | view |
| 2019-08-06 | yen070998 | 84 | view |
| 2019-05-22 | thuy vi tran | 84 | view |
| 2018-06-25 | www.www | 56 | view |
- Nowadays we are producing more and more rubbish. Why do you think this is happening? What can governments do to help reduce the amount of rubbish produced? 78
- Many young people choose to take a year off between finish school and starting university in order to gain work experience or to travel The experience of non academic life like this offers benefits the individual when they return to education To what exte 79
- With the pressures on today s young people to succeed academically some people believe that non academic subjects at school should be removed from the syllabus so that children can concentrate wholly on academic subjects To what extent do you agree or dis 89
- Nowadays we are producing more and more rubbish Why do you think this is happening What can governments do to help reduce the amount of rubbish produced 84
- Many young people choose to take a year off between finish school and starting university in order to gain work experience or to travel. The experience of non-academic life like this offers benefits the individual when they return to education. To what ex 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, firstly, if, so, well, for example, in addition, in conclusion, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1450.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45112781955 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14268625646 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.612781954887 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 458.1 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.1747037499 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.818181818 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1818181818 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4545454545 7.06120827912 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234874928795 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0871023860249 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0955299936609 0.0667982634062 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174447511936 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0731085432195 0.056905535591 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.11 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.