More and more people think there is no need for printed paper newspapers. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The means of communication has been drawing a great deal of public attention. The question of whether the digital device or the written word have a more marked influence on the measure of communication is a controversial issue. I totally agree with this point of view.
There are several reasons to explain why availing the cutting-edge devices, particularly photograph or film could reap an array of benefits. Firstly, in a digital age, speed and convenience are an integral part of communicating with other people. To be more specific, all citizens exclusively bring laptop and phone with them, which could support them to boast exchange pleasantries such as work, ordinary conversations immediately without waiting for the response for a longer duration. More importantly, employing state-of-the-art technology is to cate to people having a high rate of accuracy in typing texts by virtue of being installed applications to going their over mistakes instantly. As a result, this means that this can minimize the larger likelihood of causing their wrongdoings to those people sent.
On the contrary, many hold a belief that the use of newspaper could exert an adverse impact on our life and their increasing popularity. One major disincentive of using the written word is the cost. Competing with freely available images, the paper producers are facing the risks of falling circulation figures. From environment perspectives, the employ of paper to write, which takes its toll on many onerous problems in the environment. The reason is that residents are likely to throw their paper impulsively which pushes the amount of paper to the brink of exhaust, especially it also the main culprit dropping considerably the number of green trees by cutting trees and deforestations with the sole objective to enhance the quality of people. Although this complicated problem is not able to suffer from pressing pressures at present but in the future, this malady could be gained around by the environmental argument.
For the reasons mentioned above, I wholly believe that the advantages of employing break devices would be better in lieu of using the tradition method, particularly newspaper.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-08 | ankushgurumaa | 78 | view |
| 2024-10-10 | phuong cao | 89 | view |
| 2024-07-23 | Anh Thi | 61 | view |
| 2024-06-24 | buiquan | 56 | view |
| 2024-06-24 | buiquan | 56 | view |
- The graph below gives information about changes in the birth and death rates in New Zealand between 1901 and 2101 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Supermarkets should only sell food produced from within their own country rather than imports from overseas What are your opinions on this 84
- The table below gives information about student enrolments at Manchester University in 1937 1967 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- People think that the government should increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles to solve environmental problems Give your opinion 61
- The following maps show the changes that have taken place in Sydney International Airport since 1930 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 86
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 79, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: Whether; The question whether
...awing a great deal of public attention. The question of whether the digital device or the written word ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 18, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun hold seems to be countable; consider using: 'many holds'.
Suggestion: many holds
... those people sent. On the contrary, many hold a belief that the use of newspaper coul...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, so, such as, as a result, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1849.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 348.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3132183908 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02055510425 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626436781609 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 578.7 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.1037670743 49.4020404114 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.266666667 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118020792541 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0329537835027 0.084324248473 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0294780536318 0.0667982634062 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0636072416341 0.151304729494 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0260994253627 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.54 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.