Wealthy countries should accept more refugees and provide them with basic assistance, such as food and housing.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is commonly argued that rich nations such as the United States and Japan, should welcome a higher number of escapees and support them with primary life suppliances, including food and residence. This essay agrees to some extent with the statement because the wealthy nations can easily provide such supports with their budget, but this may also contribute to their countries’ security.
One clear reason for that is rich countries can afford refugees’ cost of living without any difficulty. In other words, they already have well-organised public utilities and world-class public health care ready for urgent cases which means they do not have to pay extra expenditure to take care of those stateless people. And they normally have social residences to provide housing to people with poverty. This can be shared to offer housing options for the refugees. For example, Russia welcomed around five thousand escapees in their country and provide them with vocational practice which helped them seek jobs to pay for their living themselves.
However, accepting too many refugees may contribute to unexpected security issues. When the nation allows people from elsewhere who do not understand their social discipline well to stay, they may adopt unacceptable or bad manners to society. This may lead to anti-social and violent behaviours which will then results in a growth of the crime rate in their country. The situation when the refugees from Myanmar illegally escape from the provided area and cause burglaries in the surrounding neighbourhood in Thailand can be an evident instance.
To conclude, I partly agree that wealthy nations should welcome and provide food and housing assistance to the refugees because they do not have to invest money on this such a thing; however, to do so may contribute to insecurity in their setting. Therefore, it is recommended that governments should release practical regulation to control the situation if they accept more refugees.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-10 | Nyasha | 61 | view |
| 2021-09-03 | Renu_art | 61 | view |
| 2021-02-27 | anoj adhikari | 33 | view |
| 2020-10-11 | Lien Huynh | 78 | view |
| 2020-06-12 | NeutronnzZ | 78 | view |
- The debate on cash versus credit card has been going on for some time Credit is still a fairly new concept within the history of finance so many people would rather stick with paper money According to you which is a better payment method cash or cred 73
- Some students work while studying. This often results in lacking time for education and constantly feeling under pressure.What do you think are the causes of this?What solutions can you suggest? 67
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Whoever controls the media also controls the opinions and attitudes of the people and there is little can be done to rectify this To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The pie charts show the amount of money that a children s charity located in the USA spent and received in one year 2016
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 183, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ve to invest money on this such a thing; however, to do so may contribute to inse...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, then, therefore, well, for example, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1672.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32484076433 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7053873015 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585987261146 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 513.9 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.3762814243 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.615384615 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1538461538 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.07692307692 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284979685869 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0950153304204 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0768126029628 0.0667982634062 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18249933783 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0915723181929 0.056905535591 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 183, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ve to invest money on this such a thing; however, to do so may contribute to inse...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, then, therefore, well, for example, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1672.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32484076433 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7053873015 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585987261146 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 513.9 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.3762814243 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.615384615 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1538461538 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.07692307692 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284979685869 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0950153304204 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0768126029628 0.0667982634062 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18249933783 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0915723181929 0.056905535591 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.