Many young people now know more about international pop and movie stars than famous people in the history of their countries. What are the causes? Give solutions to increase the number of people to know about famous people in history.
It is undeniable that youngsters nowadays tend to be indifferent to their countries’ famous historical individuals, but more familiar with popular pop and movie stars worldwide instead. There are many rationales behind this noticeable trend, and measures could certainly be taken to gain the awareness of famous people in history among the young.
To begin with, there are two primary reasons explaining this tendency. Firstly, History at schools is taught superficially. Many educational systems assume that History is a side-subject, which leads to an unchangedly tedious method of conveying the knowledge. Therefore, the students have lost their interest in such an important subject, and specifically in 2015, there was only one candidate in Nghe An province attending the History test for the university entrance examination. Secondly, it is recent advanced mass media. Thanks to the advancement of technology, we can immediately update the events occurring, especially the news of the super stars. Their images appear frequently in the community, so people are undoubtedly easier to know them.
Some measures could be taken by the schools and authorities to mitigate the problem caused by the aforementioned reasons. From the educational perspective, there should be an evolution of History’s pedagogical method. Students are much easier to acquire the tedious knowledge when they are provided with intriguing lessons to realize that History, to a great extent, has a value for their life. In terms of the governments, authorities should anually organize the commemoration for the significant contribution of the historical luminaries to the development of the countries.
All in all, various measures could be taken to gain the young’s recognition of the national historical luminaries. Therefore, they will strive not to waste those people’s great effort.
- The chart and table below give information about healthcare resources and life expectancy in different countries Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- Many young people now know more about international pop and movie stars than famous people in the history of their countries What are the causes Give solutions to increase the number of people to know about famous people in history 78
- Forests produce fresh oxygen and participate in regulating climate But every year tree cover of our planet is lessening due to deforestation What are the primary causes of deforestation To what results may it lead 84
- Homelessness is increasing in many major cities around the world What do you think are the main effects of this problem and what measures could be taken to solve it 84
- Peers can have an influence on the behavior of a child This influence can be negative or positive Is peer pressure mostly beneficial Why or why not 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 204, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...story is a side-subject, which leads to a unchangedly tedious method of conveying...
^
Line 3, column 752, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...le are undoubtedly easier to know them. Some measures could be taken by the scho...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, to begin with, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1598.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.64664310954 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14326794143 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618374558304 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.5685520017 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.533333333 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8666666667 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221099251869 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0619369207317 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.068048788197 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130710109089 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0859211805881 0.056905535591 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.49 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.89 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.