As the number of cars increases, more money has to be spent on road systems. Some people think the government should pay for this. Others, however, think that the users should cover the costs. Discuss and give your opinion.
In the light of rising private vehicle ownership, it is claimed that state fundings should be aimed at improving road infrastructure. While the idea is valid to a certain extent, I stand the viewpoint that this out-going is of joint responsibility between governments and citizens.
It is interpretable why some people take the roll of the authority in settling roadway improvement bills alone for granted. One of the most apparent rationale is that the government fund can help ameliorate downgraded roads since the officials have the social orders on their hand. Having said that, this opinion is flawed; expenditure on road renovation is notorious for being astronomically expensive. Consequently, overspending capitals on road maintenance may lead to the dearth of funds for other public domains; for instance, cutback on education subsidies for impoverished students can result in the missout on potential talents and the risk of shortage in well-educated and highly motivated future workforce. Even worse, parents with harsh conditions who have to use up the rest of their savings to pay a remarkable amount of tuition fees, thereby, end up in poverty and sadden the economic burden.
In lieu of covering the costs of road upgrades only via government funding, individuals should share this financial pressure. Undoubtedly, it is their transportation that contributes directly to the tremendous acceleration of adverse social problems ranging from traffic congestion to pollution of the air, water and noise. These issues, thus, take their tolls straight on the city dwellers’ health; more precisely, respiratory diseases are among the major reasons for hospital visiting in the urban regardless of age. To this end, new road tolls should be introduced in tandem with levying higher taxes on car imports. Ultimately, the revenue earned from these policies can be devoted for rebuilding bridges and widening narrow roads, which materially mitigates the aforementioned traffic-related matters.
Overall, there are understandable points supporting the use of only government money in road amelioration; however, this should be a shared responsibility of both vehicle owners and the authorities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-10 | Manideep Macherla | 73 | view |
| 2023-04-10 | ozair | 73 | view |
| 2023-04-10 | ozair | 56 | view |
| 2023-03-19 | xiao_alatus | 61 | view |
| 2022-08-01 | lehonganh1212 | 73 | view |
- In some cities there is little control on the design and construction of homes and other buildings and owners can decide on the styles of their houses Do the advantages of this outweigh its drawbacks 89
- The chart below shows the most important causes of stress for different age groups in Canada 92
- Some people think that newly built houses should follow the style of the old houses in the local areas Other think that people should have freedom to build houses of their own style Discuss and give opinion 84
- As the number of cars increases more money has to be spent on road systems Some people think the government should pay for this Others however think that the users should cover the costs Discuss and give your opinion 89
- Some people believe that children should spend all of their free time with their families Others believe that this is unnecessary or even negative Discuss the possible arguments on both sides and say which side you personally support 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
In the light of rising private vehicle o...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lity between governments and citizens. It is interpretable why some people take...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...overty and sadden the economic burden. In lieu of covering the costs of road up...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...forementioned traffic-related matters. Overall, there are understandable points...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, however, may, so, thus, well, while, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1869.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 336.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.5625 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15827382018 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.64880952381 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 579.6 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.0021770235 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.769230769 106.682146367 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8461538462 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.23076923077 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256579916861 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0847350299161 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0596378423773 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145254813513 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0237941353333 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.0946893788 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.61 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 78.4519038076 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.