Some people believe that children can learn effectively by watching TV and they should be encouraged to watch TV both at home and at school. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is true that watching TV can help the students study easier and much better. While some argue that children should be allowed to use television not only at home but at school as well, I only partly agree with this view.
On the one hand, the fact that children are encouraged to watch TV can be attribute to two reasons. Firstly, there are thousands of useful programs from science to humanity subjects on TV, consequently, the students can watch some programs to expand their knowledge and skills which may include the aspects their teachers may not aware of or they will not obtain at school. Even with some common subjects, TV programs can help both pupils and teachers to achieve the lesson outcomes much easier. For example, on history class, the teacher can put on the TV documentary for the students to observe the progress of the world war which is much thoroughly understood by the children. Besides, the time at school is limited but the students have many other activities to take part in so they should be given permission to watch TV program at home latter if they cannot finish watching the program at school. The teachers may attach some tasks together with encouraging pupils to watch TV program to improve the effectiveness of this way of learning.
On the other hand, TV programs carry huge sources of entertainment which can distract children from learning therefore they achieve no knowledge at all. For example, while searching for a specific program to study, the students can come across an amusing show or an attractive rom-com, consequently, they get lost on the way and forget their aim to study. Moreover, spending too much time watching TV, even though that has been done for the sake of studying, can do harm to the children’s health. In terms of short term effect, watch television so frequently can lead to the students’ eyes illness such as short-sighted or backache as they sit down for too long. In addition, this action can become a habit so the children cut down their time playing sports and other physical activities which will weaken their health condition in a long run.
In conclusion, watching TV can be helpful for the students to study much more effectively but this should be done under guidance of the teachers to make sure the learning outcomes can be obtained correctly.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-10-03 | thaotrinh | 73 | view |
| 2020-06-23 | imjessiego | 61 | view |
| 2019-08-21 | J a Hermione | 56 | view |
- Some people believe that children can learn effectively by watching TV and they should be encouraged to watch TV both at home and at school To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The most essential component of a person s life is his or her time at the workplace and life turns meaningless once no job satisfaction is obtained To what extent do you agree or disagree 82
- Full time university students should spend a lot of time studying but it is essential to be involved in other activities To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- Some people say that arts subjects such as painting or drawing should not be made compulsory for high school students To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- New parents should attend parenting courses to bring up their children well To what extent do you agree or disagree 51
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...eir health condition in a long run. In conclusion, watching TV can be helpful ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, consequently, first, firstly, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 7.85571142285 267% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1937.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 400.0 315.596192385 127% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8425 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.472135955 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58658921168 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.505 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 560.7 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.285559006 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.357142857 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5714285714 20.7667163134 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.1428571429 7.06120827912 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.424331548543 0.244688304435 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.166683419574 0.084324248473 198% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0856401522298 0.0667982634062 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.286568225877 0.151304729494 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0776709593299 0.056905535591 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 11.3001002004 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.