The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and 2010.
The two maps of a city hospital present how people access it differently in 2007 and 2010, Overall, the most visible changes during the 3-year-period is related to the newly-built roundabouts and the location of the bus station and the parking space.
In 2007, the structure of the roads is rather simple, with the Ring Road around the main building, the Hospital Road leading directly to the hospital's entrance, and City Road crossing it at the south.
However, fast forward to 2010, two roundabouts have been added: the first one is at the three-way cross between Ring Road and Hospital Road, and the second one is located where Hospital Road and City Road meet. Between the two roundabouts, at the west of Hospital Road, there is a new bus station, replacing the six small bus stops originally located on Hospital Road. The parking space has also been divided into two sections: a staff car park, which is at the old car park's location, and a public car park, which has been constructed to the east of the City Hospital.
In short, the changes made between 2007 and 2010 at the hospital have made it easier for people to transport to the site.
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activities in 2010 70
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activities in 2010
- It is important to ensure that children with a wide range of abilities and from a varietyof social backgrounds mix with each other at school To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people believe that it is essential to include physical education classes in the curriculum for all school age children Others think that children s time is better spent on more academic subjects Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- Some people believe that it is possible for a country to be economically successful and have a clean environment Others argue that these two aims are not compatible Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, second, so, in short
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 958.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74257425743 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46671797712 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509900990099 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 273.6 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 22.4926829268 147% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 40.9254063986 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 159.666666667 112.824112599 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.6666666667 22.9334400587 147% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 5.23603664747 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.400465205719 0.215688989381 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.204906292378 0.103423049105 198% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0906312886776 0.0843802449381 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.240052117947 0.15604864568 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.063361483712 0.0819641961636 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.2329268293 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.9 61.2550243902 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 11.4329268293 149% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.9970731707 138% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.