Some believe that charitable organizations should help people no matter where they live. Others argue that charities should only help those living in the country where the charity is based. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Currently there is a contentious argument over the whether charitable trusts should provide relief to citizens of their own country or to people living outside their home country as well? I believe that the charitable trusts obtain money and trust from the citizens of their own country so it will be unfair to betray the trust of their own citizens by using that money to provide relief to the people of outside nations. In this essay I will discuss both the views and then explain the rationale behind my views on this.
Beyond any qualms there are myriads of logical reasons that prove that NGOs and other charitable trusts constitute the necessary frontline workforce in case of any natural calamity such as earthquake or tsunami. People from all over the country make their own share of monetary contribution when they realize that the citizens of their own country need their help. For example, during the recent COVID-19 outbreak PM relief fund was flooded with enormous relief amount by people depositing money from all over the country. Had this been the case for helping the people of another country would the citizens had gone an extra mile to help? I doubt that!
On the contrary, others believe that it is pessimistic to think in this way. They believe that humanity is above any race, religion or nationality. The charitable institutes should not be restricted to help the people of another country for the sake of humanity. This will also improve the international bonding among the two countries and increase the harmonious ties with the neighboring nations.
In conclusion, I believe that although it is better for charities to provide help irrespective of case, religion or nation, however; this approach is quiet impractical, The citizens who are responsible for contributing towards the finances for such charities will be hesitant as they might not be emotionally linked to the distress of the citizens of another nation. Will this approach ever be successful? Still remains a question.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-11-07 | AKNIC | 73 | view |
| 2020-10-25 | ankita.hpgdc | 87 | view |
| 2020-10-07 | vikrampreet SINGH | 89 | view |
- Nowadays we are producing more and more rubbish Why do you think this is happening What can governments do to help reduce the amount of rubbish produced 56
- Earlier technological developments brought more benefits and changed the lives of ordinary people more than recent developments ever will To what extent do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own 73
- The only reason to work hard is to earn money To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- People across the world are more similar than they are different To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- You should spend about 40 minutes on this task Write about the following topic In some countries it is now illegal to reject someone applying for a job because of his or her age Do you think this is a positive or negative development Give reasons for your 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, so, still, then, well, for example, in conclusion, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1681.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 333.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04804804805 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6234148984 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504504504505 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 520.2 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 85.0492354403 49.4020404114 172% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.071428571 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7857142857 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.78571428571 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200821057372 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0706485473063 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0553503741209 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125873229197 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.029719986801 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.