The first car appeared on British roads in 1888. By the year 2000 there may be as many as 29 million vehicles on British roads. Alternative forms of transport should be encouraged and international laws introduced to control car ownership and use. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your knowledge or experience.
Nowadays, the issue of alternative forms of vehicles for cars is of current interest because the level of population is growing sharply what causes the increase of the transport using. Since 1888, about 29 million cars have been made in Britain. However, today people started to think about forbidding cars and usage of non-motorized vehicles such as rickshaws. Personally, I partly agree with the idea that alternative forms of transport should be used and international laws introduced to control car ownership because the amount of cars affects people in a negative way.
From the one side, cars are very convenient in use. Firstly, one can get to the place faster and with bigger comfort rather than on underground railway or by bike. Secondly, sometimes the price for maintaining the car is more reasonable than permanent using, for example, a taxi because frequent long distance travelling with a taxi driver usually costs more.
From another side, using this kind of vehicle has many disadvantages. First of all, it is the emission of gases and, as a result, air pollution. There are many environmentally friendly kinds of transport but most of them are not as convenient as cars. For instance, bike and rollers are useful for person's health but mostly it takes a great deal more time to get to the place with their help. What is more, in many countries there are no cycling lanes, so people put their health in risk. In addition, there are traffic jams due to the amount of vehicles. Sometimes ones cannot get to their work in time even going by car and because of this people become stressed and disappointed.
Finally, I believe that there should be used fewer cars to save the planet and its atmosphere. Nevertheless, they cannot be forbidden or encouraged by the international laws because cars are very comfortable and time saving vehicles. Therefore, it only depends on humanity whether they will change their way of using transport or not.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-07 | JOE Chen | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-05 | Selena17_ | 73 | view |
| 2021-09-21 | muhammad Hamza | 73 | view |
| 2021-08-10 | ivantran | 78 | view |
| 2021-01-11 | MinatureNomad | 66 | view |
- Children can learn more efficiently by watching television Children should watch television regularly both in school and at home Do you agree or disagree 61
- Children can learn more efficiently by watching television Children should watch television regularly both in school and at home Do you agree or disagree 56
- Some people think the money spent in developing the technology for space exploration is not justified There are more beneficial ways to spend this money 61
- The charts below provide information on popular modes of transport in the city of Cambridge for the years 2008 and 2018 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 75
- Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment only governments and large companies can make a difference To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 556, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a negative way" with adverb for "negative"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...cause the amount of cars affects people in a negative way. From the one side, cars are very conv...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 637, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...n time even going by car and because of this people become stressed and disappointed...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, however, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in addition, kind of, such as, as a result, first of all, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1631.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95744680851 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73029212026 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.0884511426 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.9411764706 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3529411765 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7647058824 7.06120827912 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292601798762 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0896619134241 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0842926207449 0.0667982634062 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176150077082 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11300332557 0.056905535591 199% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.