In some countries, secondary schools aim to provide a general education across a range of subjects. In others, children focus on a narrow range of subjects related to a particular career. Which of these two systems is more appropriate in today’s world?
Currently, in some parts of the world, high school children are being offered a focused curriculum in order to achieve future occupational goals; whereas, other countries provide their children with a wide range of knowledge, which makes them mature in every aspect of life. While both approaches have merits and drawbacks, I personally believe that former system is more effective because those students are more likely to have a better professional life.
Studying few subjects ensures plenty of time for students to concentrate on their narrow area of study. In other words, specialization always saves their valuable time, which can be utilized to research and to do experiments. In turn this will lead to better academic results, thereby securing admission to high ranking universities and getting better occupations. However, one may argue that focused students lack general knowledge, which is essential to experience a good social and professional life. Even though, they do not have a superficial idea of number of school subjects, they are surely enriched with useful soft skills, such as time management, critical thinking and independent problem solving, as a result of extensive researching. Making things better is that they can focus on one thing at a time, and this capability therefore helps them to perform at a high proficiency level. So, these students gain life skills and deep knowledge that are vital components of one’s successful career.
In contrast, students with general knowledge might find it difficult to enter in to the job market as they have not been trained for a particular occupation. In addition to that, were they to enter in to the global work force, it would be more difficult for them to perform with the focused employees, who have a competitive edge. Other key negative point of these students is that they lack innovative thinking, whereby new inventions are gifted to the world. This supported by a recent study conducted at Colombo University, in which they claim that inventors are always focused learners.
In conclusion, the key to successful career is rather to gain a deep knowledge on particular subject than to learn a large number of subjects, which is a waste of time in view of better professional life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-26 | hamy221799 | 73 | view |
| 2023-04-15 | Chien2k8 | 78 | view |
| 2022-10-14 | vishal sachdeva | 67 | view |
| 2022-09-14 | i98yy | 84 | view |
| 2021-06-19 | dhruv j patel | 73 | view |
- Some parents do not want their children to work part time while in school so that they can concentrate on their studies Other parents believe their kids should learn to manage study and work duties as this teaches them certain skills they cannot learn at 84
- Some parents do not want their children to work part time while in school so that they can concentrate on their studies Other parents believe their kids should learn to manage study and work duties as this teaches them certain skills they cannot learn at 84
- Some parents do not want their children to work part time while in school so that they can concentrate on their studies Other parents believe their kids should learn to manage study and work duties as this teaches them certain skills they cannot learn at 84
- In some countries secondary schools aim to provide a general education across a range of subjects In others children focus on a narrow range of subjects related to a particular career Which of these two systems is more appropriate in today s world 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 63, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[4]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'deep knowledge'.
Suggestion: deep knowledge
... to successful career is rather to gain a deep knowledge on particular subject than to learn a l...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 116, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...dge on particular subject than to learn a large number of subjects, which is a waste of time in v...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, so, therefore, whereas, while, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1908.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 368.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1847826087 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81622442959 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559782608696 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 600.3 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.2193119073 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.285714286 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2857142857 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198858833242 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0631496761123 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0521408435197 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124432594179 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0498431827797 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.