The best way to solve the world’s environmental problem is to increase the price of fuel. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Over the last half-century, there has been a dramatic increase in the number of vehicles on the road. This has resulted in numerous traffic jams and consequently, high levels of pollution. While some people opine that one of the many ways to solve this global problem is to raise fuel prices, I am strongly inclined to disagree that it is the best solution.
Firstly, a rise in fuel prices will indirectly influence the prices of products in markets as a result of increased transportation costs. Consequently, products become less affordable and the poverty level rises. For instance, a recent study published in Nigeria reveals that 80% of consumables are sensitive to changes in fuel prices. At the same time, a rise in fuel price will only invoke discomfort among the people who are affluent to own cars but will not drastically change the behaviour of people in using cars by reducing the number of cars in traffic or on the roads. Therefore, fuel price growth will only attract new problems. A better way would be to construct new roads and improve the methods of public transportation.
Furthermore, there is evidence that waste gas from cars is not the leading cause of environmental problems. The main culprits may be the industrial wastes discharged from the rapidly manufacturing industries. Therefore, reducing the number of cars will not suddenly give us a blue sky and fresh air. We could tackle these pollutions by establishing strict controls to reduce industrial wastes through the use of environmentally friendly raw materials and renewable energy sources in factories.
To sum up, it can be seen that the cons of fuel price increase outweigh the pros, hence I am strongly against the idea. Scientists and government can search for cleaner energy sources to adapt like solar or nuclear energy to replace fuel. They can prevent this situation from deteriorating further through new mobility solutions and innovation in renewable energy.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-03-10 | lakhveer khokhar | 84 | view |
| 2021-03-26 | parabshreyas | 84 | view |
| 2021-01-22 | leeeelian | 89 | view |
| 2020-10-02 | Chaman Bhardwaj | 73 | view |
- Write about the following topic Some people think that hosting an international sports event is good for the country while some people think it is bad Discuss both views and state your opinion Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples 78
- One long distance flight consumes fuel which a car consumes in several years but they cause the same amount of pollution Some people think we should discourage nonessential flights such as tourist travel rather than limit the use of cars To what extent do 89
- You went to the local hospital s Emergency Department with your young child who had severe stomach pains You had to wait for almost four hours before your daughter was treated by a doctor and while you were waiting you were constantly ignored by the other 84
- Some people think the money spent on developing technology for space exploration is not justified There are more beneficial ways to spend this money Do you agree or disagree 84
- You are a club secretary An expert from a different country recently gave a talk at the club Write a letter to thank him her and say how club members enjoyed it Include the following in your letter When and where did the talk take place Explain why the me 81
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, may, so, therefore, while, for instance, in fact, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1652.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14641744548 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90935378352 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595015576324 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 506.7 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.6940554632 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.25 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0625 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.9375 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182148762041 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0524955161468 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0590345550703 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101503772391 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0521761481197 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.