New technologies have changes the way children spend their free time. Do advantages of this outweigh disadvantages?
It is a well known fact that nowadays due to the incredibly fast development of outstanding technologies an enormous quantity of various activities changes their ordinary way of work, communication, and interaction with others. Undoubtedly, the latest technology influences on children's leisure time, how they contribute their free time as well as how youngsters perceive surroundings. Having absolutely available opportunity to utilize digital devices might be a positive and rewarding experience, but I guess minuses of technology usage far outweigh pluses.
On the one hand, there is an explicit speculation that in comparison with past times, modern kids are much progressive due to dedicating their free time to exploration of extraordinary abilities of devices. Unquestionably, when a kid has spare time it is necessary for him or her ,in order to recharge batteries, to play magnificent games or watch some interesting videos on various online platforms. For instance, currently a lot of games require skills such as complete attention, intelligence, and sometimes well-trained communication abilities. In addition to this, occasionally some childrens become so curious and they devote their rest time to acquire beneficial information that might help them in the near future.
On the other hand, according to current research it is definitely prominent that modern technology is the main cause of diseases emergence in the young period of life. Additionally, some of these illnesses are inextricably connected not only with physical disability but also with mental disorders. For instance, because of the ubiquity of technology parents stopped to notify that their kids even in free time extensively utilize their devices, which leads to illnesses such as cardiovascular disease, problems with eyesight.
In conclusion, after all arguments have been discussed in detail, I think that disadvantages of modern technology have tangible negative effects on kids’ health.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-17 | dhanga | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-13 | hieu13092006 | 73 | view |
| 2023-01-15 | bảo thi | 56 | view |
| 2022-11-27 | Lunar Tran | 67 | view |
| 2022-09-25 | myanh12345 | 56 | view |
- The two plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the park today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features make comparison where relevant 78
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The graph and chart below give information about 3D cinema screens and film release Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 82
- The diagrams below show some principles of house design for cool and warm climates 89
- The diagram below shows the Petersburg Art Museum before and after renovations Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 280, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...pare time it is necessary for him or her ,in order to recharge batteries, to play ...
^^
Line 2, column 724, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hat might help them in the near future. On the other hand, according to current ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, well, after all, for instance, i guess, i think, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1685.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.6734006734 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24316364017 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.649831649832 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 545.4 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 30.016249043 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.181818182 106.682146367 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 20.7667163134 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.1818181818 7.06120827912 173% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275814377816 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0888005379314 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0623149345068 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153461585869 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0587984890388 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.8 13.0946893788 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.15 50.2224549098 54% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.72 8.58950901804 125% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 9.78957915832 169% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.