memoir of Chevalier de Seingalt
The reading and the lecture are both discussing about the Chevalier's memoir which he wrote his life and adventures. Whereas the author of the reading states that his memoir has a value in the European historical society. Moreover, the author of the article states that the Chevalier invented many events to make his life seem more interesting than it really was. However, the speaker agreed with the reading on the influence of this memoir. In contrast, she mentioned this memoir is reliable and accurate. Also, she disputes this argument by providing three main reasons.
First of all, according to the passage, evidence has shown that the Chevalier borrowed a huge amount of money. In his memoir he claimed that he was very rich. Thus, Critics argued that he made that up in his memoir. In contrast, the speaker refutes this argument. She mentions that the reason for Chevalier to loan money is that he was waiting for his money to arrive. She added that he loved parties and gambling which make Chevalier to not wait for his money.
Secondly, the reading claim that critics are also questioned about the possibility of occurrence of the famous conversation for Chevalier with Voltaire. Nevertheless, the speaker believes that Chevalier has wrote down the whole conversation and kept for many years hidden.
Finally, the reading states that also critics are questioned the possibility of Chevalier's escape. He escaped from notorious prison in Italy through a hole in the ceiling by using only piece of metal and climbed to the roof. Additionally, the reading made an argument that the jailers were bribed to free him. However, the speaker challenged this argument. She mentioned that he was not connected with powerful men in the prison. Moreover, she added that a document of repairing the roof has been found in that days. A question can be raised why they asked to fix their roof unless he truly escaped through that hole.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-10 | funmiphysio | 70 | view |
| 2021-05-12 | Shrushti Krishna Vishwasrao | 73 | view |
| 2021-03-30 | dsaqwe123 | 60 | view |
| 2021-03-30 | dsaqwe123 | 76 | view |
| 2020-11-08 | adru | 73 | view |
- integrated toefl writing 3
- Sea otter decline population 65
- sea otter declining population 78
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement My lifestyle is easier and more comfortable than the one my grandparents experienced when they were young Use specific reasons and examples to support your choice 66
- certify wood companies 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 435, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... reading on the influence of this memoir In contrast she mentioned this memoir is...
^^
Line 3, column 452, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...make Chevalier to not wait for his money Secondly the reading claim that critics ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 205, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'written'.
Suggestion: written
...the speaker believes that Chevalier has wrote down the whole conversation and kept fo...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
...ation and kept for many years hidden Finally the reading states that also critics ar...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 607, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nless he truly escaped through that hole
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, really, second, secondly, so, thus, whereas, in contrast, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 12.0772626932 157% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 22.412803532 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 30.3222958057 132% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.01324503311 219% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1582.0 1373.03311258 115% => OK
No of words: 324.0 270.72406181 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88271604938 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45137905255 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.472222222222 0.540411800872 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 495.0 419.366225166 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 8.23620309051 12% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 13.0662251656 8% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 324.0 21.2450331126 1525% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.2860985944 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1582.0 110.228320801 1435% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 324.0 21.698381199 1493% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 129.0 7.06452816374 1826% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 4.33554083885 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165248742922 0.272083759551 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.165248742922 0.0996497079465 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109361627393 0.162205337803 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0565035880862 0.0443174109184 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 163.6 13.3589403974 1225% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -248.92 53.8541721854 -462% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 5.55761589404 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 128.5 11.0289183223 1165% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 12.5 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 22.92 8.42419426049 272% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 66.0 63.6247240618 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 54.0 10.7273730684 503% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 131.6 10.498013245 1254% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.