Museum and art galleries should concentrate on works that show the history and culture of their own country rather than works of other parts of the world. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some people believe that museums and art galleries should place more emphasis on works portraying national history and culture instead of those with international themes. Personally, I partly agree with the notion as both types of artworks can bring different levels of advantages to the visitors and the museum and art shows.
On the one hand, exhibitions that display artworks with domestic themes can increase the income of the museum and art galleries per se and of the nation in general. Specifically, nowadays, as there are many foreign visitors who are in quest of the novel history and culture of an alien country, exhibitions representing the nation can attract the interest of such individuals. Not only would this increase the income of museums, art galleries, and tourist industry but it also boosts their reputation and international status in their fields.
On the other hand, artworks with international themes can help with the understanding of local citizens, especially the young ones. In fact, international works grant visitors insights into the history and culture of different countries around the world. In this era of ever-increasing globalization, this type of knowledge can be tremendously beneficial for them. Besides, it enhances their reverence for the unique features of their country. Therefore, international works can benefit local visitors in a significant way.
To conclude, despite controversial schools of thought on determining the focus of museums and art galleries, I endorse the hypothesis that they concentrate on both works of national and international themes. While the former can attract more foreigners to the country, the latter can broaden citizens’ understanding of the world.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-03-25 | vidung | 73 | view |
| 2021-05-15 | @hoangnguyen | 73 | view |
- It is more important to spend public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle in order to prevent illness than to spend it on treatment of people who are already ill To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Instead of requiring primary school students to do experiments themselves schools should only allow them to watch experiments demonstrated by teachers To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- The process for recycling plastic bottles 78
- Today different types of robots are developed which are good friends to us and help us both at home and work Is this a positive or negative development 78
- Students should focus on all subjects in school equally or should learn only subjects that they are best at or interest in the most Discuss both views and give your own opinion 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 503, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a significant way" with adverb for "significant"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...tional works can benefit local visitors in a significant way. To conclude, despite controversial sc...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, so, therefore, while, in fact, in general, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 13.1623246493 23% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1467.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49438202247 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09791036556 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.531835205993 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 451.8 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.8127439372 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.25 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22600106605 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0861556408401 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0642628992166 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145768470634 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0483890904756 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.