Many people believe that the best way to produce a happier society is to ensure that there is a small difference of earning between the richest and the poorest. To what extend do you agree or disagree?
Some individuals suggest that maintaining small discrepancies between the income of affluent and poverty-stricken members of society is the best way to sustain happiness among the general public. Personally, I strongly oppose the notion as there are other completely different methods with superior efficiency.
On the one hand, governments can implement many policies that directly result in the well-being of citizens. Specifically, authorities should render education more accessible, which will allow more children to be well-trained and educated, leading to an increase in employment rates in the future. Besides, financial resources should be allocated to healthcare and medical treatment, significantly reducing the illness rates among people. With the need for basic living conditions such as jobs and healthcare be met, the general public can feel more contented with their lives.
On the other hand, the promotion of a healthy lifestyle would significantly enhance the sense of contentment among individuals. In fact, educating people about a healthy living style can help them to strike a balance between working or studying and leisure time. In this way, the stress resulted from the excessive workload and the pressure of school work, lowering the possibility of acquiring mental problems among citizens. Consequently, governments can instill a balanced living way to produce a happier society.
To conclude, despite controversial opinions on determining the ultimate solutions for a happy society, I endorse the hypothesis that several measures can be adopted instead of the equal distribution of income among citizens. Not only should the governments improve the rudimentary living standards but they should also encourage a healthy lifestyle.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-05-17 | @hoangnguyen | 61 | view |
- Today different types of robots are developed which are good friends to us and help us both at home and work Is this a positive or negative development 78
- When people learn a foreign language all four listening reading speaking writing skills are equally important To what extent do you agree or disagree v 81
- Some people think that climate change could have a negative effect on business Other people think that climate change could create more business opportunities Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- People believe that children commit crimes should be punished Others think parents should be punished instead Discuss both view and give your opinion 67
- Some people think that personal happiness is directly affected by economic success Others think that there are completely different factors that are more important Discuss both views and give your opinions 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 181, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...best way to sustain happiness among the general public. Personally, I strongly oppose the noti...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 521, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...such as jobs and healthcare be met, the general public can feel more contented with their live...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, if, so, still, well, in fact, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1501.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.75095785441 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09967605757 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.64367816092 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 471.6 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.0116941071 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.083333333 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0893668033693 0.244688304435 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0341447119272 0.084324248473 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0463996704057 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0582882237879 0.151304729494 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0554935100739 0.056905535591 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.07 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.43 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.