The plans show the change of a small theater in 2010 and 2012.
The maps depict modifications to a small theater in two different years, 2010 and 2012. Overall, the theater underwent a complete transformation with various facilities being relocated, replace ore added.
Between 2010 and 2012, the ticket office was moved to the right of the main gate, so it was more convenient for those wishing to buy tickets. The theater was further expanded to the left-hand side of the main entrance, occupying the space where the administration office and ticket office used to be. Because in 2012, those place was replaced into some restaurants and the admin office was moved to the top left corner.
Another major change to the area was the rearrangement of the storage. It was relocated to the east of the theater and replaced by the media with small showers. As a result, the media was converted into a hall in 2012. Furthermore, the stage witnessed an expansion in size between 2010 and 2012.
- The diagram shows production of sugar by a german company for supermarkets and restaurants 100
- The pictures below show the process of making clothes from recycled plastic bottles Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The graph below shows information about the total oil consumption of four major consumers from 2009 to 2030 73
- The pie and bar charts below show the percentage of water consumption and use in Australia in 2004 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 63
- The chart below shows the number of passengers who used public transport in Somewhere town from 2012 to 2015
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, so, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 768.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 157.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89171974522 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53976893118 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7301000691 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56050955414 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 234.0 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.0138858761 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.3333333333 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4444444444 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.55555555556 5.23603664747 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243378678351 0.215688989381 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111893966644 0.103423049105 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0813837206802 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187831446382 0.15604864568 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0701325346464 0.0819641961636 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.