Some people think that strict punishments for driving offences are the key to reducing traffic accidents. Others, however, believe that other measures would be more effective in improving road safety. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
In recent years, the number of accidents has been rising steadily, which lead to the rising concern over the safety issues on the road. While a lot of people think that traffic incidents can be reduced by implementing strict rules, others believe there are more effective solutions that can be used to enhance road safety.
On the one hand, It is understandable to charge a heavy fine on people who have reckless manners while driving on the street, which often leads to car-crash accidents or fatality events. For instance, drivers who use their phones whilst commuting, often unaware of the impending consequences. They can either be a victim of road accidents or be a culprit of getting others who driving next to them injured unintentionally. Therefore, strict laws and monetary fines will act as a deterrence to traffic offences. Consequently, such a heavy fine policy will make them more alert when travelling on the road. As a result, heavy punishments will do wonders in improving road safety and secure the wellbeing of the citizens.
On the other hand, there are alternative solutions that the government can take on to minimize traffic accidents, such as installing more surveillance cameras, limiting speed driving. Also, improving the quality of infrastructures and facilities on the roads such as traffic signs and lights to make them more noticeable to drivers. Moreover, the government can opt to promote safety-driving orientation programs for teenagers in order to facilitate them with good driving conducts and knowledge about the possible consequences if they fail to conform to the traffic rules. Those young people who meet their driving requirement age should be strictly assessed and graded before being allowed to start driving.
In conclusion, I totally agree that strict laws will help to reduce traffic incidents. However, there are also effective alternative solutions that should be taken into consideration.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-16 | llrasthy J | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-15 | vuongthaolinh | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-03 | quynhanhbuiviet | 78 | view |
| 2023-01-26 | Bekhruz | 73 | view |
| 2022-03-31 | mohammad.iraf | 78 | view |
- In today s world private companies rather than the government pay for and conduct most scientific research Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 95
- 18 02 2023 New technologies have changed the way children spend their free time Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 89
- Research shows that some activities are good for health and others are bad Despite knowing that millions of people engage in unhealthy activities What is the cause of this What can be done 89
- Some people think that strict punishments for driving offences are the key to reducing traffic accidents Others however believe that other measures would be more effective in improving road safety Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 67
- In order to study at university students are required to pay costly fees Not all students can afford such expensive ones so some people think that university education should be free for everyone To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1637.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29773462783 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93634709232 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572815533981 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 512.1 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.7507838262 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.928571429 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0714285714 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.92857142857 7.06120827912 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298543450856 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.096876776951 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0610938666219 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183329136666 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0546657651082 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.