It is more important to spend public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle in order to prevent illness than to spend it on treatment of people who are already ill. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Public budgets have been allocated to various tasks to ensure people’s life quality. Regarding maintaining public health, it is suggested that spending the money on promoting healthier lifestyles is more impactful than treating the ill. I disagree with this viewpoint because both tasks are equally important.
On one hand, highlighting the necessity of a healthy lifestyle is more of a proactive approach to preventing illnesses. First and foremost, this appears to be a more sustainable, long-term strategy because an overall healthy body is an important precursor to not only reducing disease contraction but also recovering from existing ones. For instance, those who exercise regularly are less likely to fall sick and typically regain their health faster than their less active counterparts. What is more, there are terminal ailments that cannot be decisively cured, such as HIV or certain types of cancer. Financing efforts to treat these diseases, consequently, could be viewed as a drain on the national budget.
On the other hand, it is equally important to allocate enough resources to facilitate patients’ treatment. Firstly, as people pay taxes and insurance, they deserve to be taken care of when they are sick and require financial support to cover the expense of their treatment. Withdrawing this benefit is likely to breed resentment among members of the public. Also, despite efforts to lead a balanced and active life, there are medical urgencies that are unpreventable, especially diseases that are related to new viruses, bacteria as well as unexpected injuries. Oftentimes, these situations justifiably necessitate the use of available resources. Lastly, while there are indeed incurable ailments, investing in clinical research and practices in search of effective treatments ultimately benefits everyone, as aside from finding the possible cure, the process yields other innovations in the field of medicines as well as other disciplines, as exemplified by the advent of more complicated and precise tools for surgeries.
On a balanced, it is in my conviction that preventing and curing illness is equally crucial. While encouraging a healthy lifestyle is more proactive, it should not be prioritized over treating those who are affected by diseases and injuries.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-02 | nguyen.ttn1998 | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-12 | pwlihnkt | 84 | view |
| 2022-10-22 | khanhkhanhkhanhkhanhkhanh | 73 | view |
| 2022-08-10 | nhattram39 | 84 | view |
| 2022-08-10 | nhattram39 | 84 | view |
- The practice of illegally hunting wild animals continues to cause concern in many countries particularly developing countries What are the causes of such hunting What are the effects on the animals and on the wider human society in these countries and bey 89
- Many people today are worried about the large quantities of waste produced by ordinary households What problems are caused by household waste What solutions may be possible in both the short and the long term 89
- Nowadays more tasks at home and work are being performed by robots Is this a negative or positive development 67
- Many believe that it is important to protect all wild animals while others think that it is important to protect some not all of them Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- Knowing how to make a group presentation is the most important task for anyone in the world of work today How important are presentation and public speaking skills compared with various other work skills Which skill is the most important ability for most 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, if, lastly, regarding, so, well, while, for instance, such as, as well as, what is more, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 13.1623246493 190% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1949.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 352.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53693181818 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98671164907 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619318181818 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 623.7 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.0166665478 49.4020404114 148% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.8125 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.1875 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243190870439 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0689403936242 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0776539810377 0.0667982634062 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149809017063 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0703074576816 0.056905535591 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.51 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 129.0 78.4519038076 164% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.