moving from rural areas to big cities
The history of human migration can date back to the prehistoric times when massive human movements took place globally in search of a better living environment with fertile land. This human instinct in seeking for betterment, in fact, is still a crucial driving force to prompt a growing number of young migrants from the countryside to cities for education and work.
Resulting from imbalanced social development in multiple aspects, the geographical differences in life quality are the major triggers. Less likely to be a regional economic or political center to attract large cooperation’s investments, most rural or remoted areas may not be able to show their competitive advantages in the provision sufficient job opportunities, let alone with the rewarding position with competitive compensation and benefit packages. As a result, despited of the fierce competition in the local labour market, many metropolises thank to their prosperity, are attractive to fresh graduates in terms of higher incomes and more promising career paths with substantial work experience accumulated from famous companies. Meanwhile, benefiting from the stronger economy, urban infrastructure, including the education system, tends to be better developed, with more funding on teaching facilities and competitive incentives to experienced faculty.
In general, such a trend brings more merits to young individuals. Even though they are likely to encounter a series of life pressure from either their work or study due to the fierce competition in urban area, the returns, as mentioned before, are evident. Otherwise, they would not have been tempted to leave their hometown. The side-effect of this phenomenon to both rural and urban areas, however, might be more worrying than what a society can benefit from. From a macro prospective, the entire human resource of society might have been better utilized. Yet, the beneficiary is the big cities only. Losing young and competent work force is the most frequent loss to the farming industry and thus, the local economic progress is stagnant so that the gap between these two areas might be further widened. Besides, the uneven population distribution may lead to other human resource related problems. The soaring property price originating from joint-effect between the limited urban space and raising accommodation demands is one of many typical examples.
In conclusion, the occurrence of this tren is mainly attributed to the greater chances, as well as, the possibly improved living standard accordingly. Be that as it may, the adverse impacts of the disequilibrium in the population distribution between rural and urban areas on the society as a whole might be significant.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-13 | thu12 | view | |
| 2022-01-18 | yamchips | 78 | view |
| 2021-12-12 | thaoxinhdep | 56 | view |
| 2021-07-10 | farshid.manami@yahoo.com | 73 | view |
| 2021-06-14 | hin07 | 89 | view |
- The chart below shows the annual pay thousands of US dollars for doctors and other workers in seven countries in 2004 87
- The charts below show the percentage of people aged 23 65 in different occupations in one UK town and the UK as a whole in 2008 80
- The chart shows the proportion of people in a UK survey carried out in three different years who said they were interested in certain sports. 89
- The map below show the changes to an art gallery floor plan in 2005 and the present day 68
- The chart below shows a comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in 1995 and 2005. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 330, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[14]
Message: Did you mean 'side effect' (=adverse effect, unintended consequence)? Open compounds are not hyphenated.
Suggestion: side effect
...en tempted to leave their hometown. The side-effect of this phenomenon to both rural and ur...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, besides, but, however, if, may, so, still, thus, well, while, in conclusion, in fact, in general, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 41.998997996 143% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2299.0 1615.20841683 142% => OK
No of words: 420.0 315.596192385 133% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47380952381 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52701905584 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01825417694 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 245.0 176.041082164 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583333333333 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 731.7 506.74238477 144% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 12.0 2.52805611222 475% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.5616311243 49.4020404114 147% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.235294118 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7058823529 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.88235294118 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199708277069 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0594382374643 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0562887041146 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107281568582 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0473256351182 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.35 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 147.0 78.4519038076 187% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.