Knowing how to make a group presentation is the most important task for anyone in the world of work today How important are presentation and public speaking skills compared with various other work skills Which skill is the most important ability for most
The modern workplace requires working adults to have a range of skills, among which the ability to deliver a group presentation is suggested to be the most vital. While the presentation and public speaking skills are indeed of value, they are only a tertiary skillset and less significant than personal and interpersonal management, which will be proved in the following essay.
Discussing the role of presentation skills, people highlight the fact that they are instrumental to effective work-related communication between colleagues as well as leaders. For instance, in meetings, employees are often requested to report work progress or present ideas for projects. Utilizing presentation techniques, such as creating an engaging delivery and attractive visuals, presenters can convey ideas clearly and leave a good impression, the last of which could heighten prospects of promotion. Leaders also make use of effective public speaking skills when the occasion for inspiring speeches or setting goals and assessing team performance arises. However, it is also true that presentation skills are becoming increasingly replaceable. For instance, in the field of medicines, seminars happen less frequently due to their time-consuming nature while finance and consumer companies, despite their recognition of effective leaders, rarely require them to address large groups of workers.
The aforementioned significance of presentation skills seems pale in comparison to that of management techniques, which are applied on various levels. Most importantly, the ability to manage personal workloads, including prioritizing tasks and reiterating schedules, is key to elevating work productivity and forming an intrinsic source of motivation tied to personal professional growth. For instance, capable workers can often allocate sufficient time to their work duties, troubleshoot problems and find ways to remove them, ensuring their progress as a result. While less important, interpersonal management is crucial in collaborative projects. This could be exemplified by how effective team managers are able to set and monitor team objectives and coordinate members to maintain work flow.
In brief, it is in my conviction that while presentation and public speaking skills should not be neglected, they are far less crucial than the ability to manage individual professional responsibilities and coordinate team members.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-15 | vevinawynn | 56 | view |
| 2021-06-23 | Quân Lê 2020 | 61 | view |
| 2021-06-23 | Quân Lê 2020 | 84 | view |
| 2021-06-23 | Quân Lê 2020 | 61 | view |
| 2021-06-16 | Quân Lê 2020 | 89 | view |
- In some countries more and more adults are living with their parents after graduating from college University or even after finding a job Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 84
- Some people believe that a country will benefit greatly if its students study abroad To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- In many countries truancy skipping classes is a worrying problem for both parents and educators What are the causes of truancy What may be the effects on the child and the wider community 89
- The plans below show the changes at a small theater in 2010 and 2012 73
- The diagrams below show the development of the horse over a period of 40 million years Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisions where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 233, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sibilities and coordinate team members.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, well, while, as for, for instance, in brief, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.3376753507 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2069.0 1615.20841683 128% => OK
No of words: 353.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.8611898017 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23129017372 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580736543909 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 634.5 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.8404144604 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.785714286 106.682146367 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2142857143 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.14285714286 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306489160458 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101464261813 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0515398085608 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183692557199 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0385033115596 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.8 13.0946893788 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 50.2224549098 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.0 12.4159519038 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.15 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 78.4519038076 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.