It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct (e.g. dinosaur, dodo…) There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In this day and age, there has been debatable that while some people believe that we should not try to prohibit animal species such as dinosaur or dodo from getting vanished, others think that we should try to keep animal species from being on the brink of extinction. According to my knowledge, I totally agree with the second view.
On the one hand, there is a wide range of reasons to explain why we should bend over backwards to hold back animal species from disappearing. One evident strength is that some types of animal species play a significant role in our life. It might cater for daily people’s demand. For instance, people can catch chicken or duck to eat in case they do not have money to buy in the market. Furthermore, hunting animal species is also considered as a main source of income to humans such as hunters. They usually go to forest and seek out animal species to sell for others to earn a living day-to-day.
In addition to that, The natural habitats of wildlife also have some major influences on the economic development of a nation. The bio-diversity of animal species will greatly contribute to the rich of cultural values of the country. Thus, it potentially leaves a good impression on foreign tourists and attracts them to pay a visit. This, therefore, can create substantial revenue for the tourism industry as well as boosting the advent of the economy in a nation.
In conclusion, there is a host of great perks which animal species have been brought to people’s lives. As a result, it will be better for us to try our best to deter animal species from dying out instead of letting them disappear in this world.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-27 | Lê Khánh Diệp | 84 | view |
| 2022-01-12 | lennie.butera | 89 | view |
| 2022-01-06 | lennie.butera | 89 | view |
| 2022-01-06 | lennie.butera | 89 | view |
| 2021-10-09 | Kien Vu | 84 | view |
- Nowadays people waste a lot of food that was bought from shops and restaurants Why do you think people waste food What can be done to reduce the amount of food they throw away 89
- Some people think that the only way to improve safety of our roads is to give much stricter punishments on driving offenses To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Some countries allow old people to work to any age that they want Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 73
- Many students find it difficult to concentrate or pay attention in school What are the reasons What could be done to solve this problem 78
- Children should do organized activities in their free time while others believe children should be free to do what they want Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, second, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1368.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.70103092784 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57753950952 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.573883161512 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 425.7 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.3451504968 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.7142857143 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7857142857 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2857142857 7.06120827912 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.310352015374 0.244688304435 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0898265868457 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0658703975414 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182566985519 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0688816064929 0.056905535591 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.98 12.4159519038 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.