Q10 Development in technology causes environmental problems. Some people believe the solution in these problems is everyone accepts a simpler way of life, while others say that technology can solve these problems. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Recently, the question of how to cope with environmental issues has become the subject of heated debate. Some people assert that technology allows humans to handle environmental problems, while others argue otherwise. Personally, I wholeheartedly agree with the former stance. In the following essay, both views will be discussed before a conclusion is reached with my opinion.
On the one hand, those who claim that having a simpler way of life can alleviate the level of environmental concerns do so for several reasons. Proponents of this argument insist that with the advent of personal vehicles, a multitude of individuals drive cars, operated by fossil fuels, emitting a huge amount of CO2, which leads to air pollution as well as climate change. These exert a detrimental influence on the quality of people's life. In addition, numerous goods made of non-disposable plastic are consumed by a myriad of everyday people, posing a threat to the environment. Given these points, some people hold the view that changing our lifestyle into a simpler way, such as avoiding using plastic bags and commuting to and from work by public transport can ease these enivornmental problems.
My opinion, however, is that mankind should make use of technology in order to combat contemporary issues related to the environment. Perhaps the most compelling reason is that a large number of companies invest vast sums of money in developing the way to utilise renewable energy, including electricity, so as to lessen environmental degradation. As an illustration, Tesla which is a notable firm in the field of the automobile industry could release private vehicles using electricity as an energy source with the help of technological progress. In fact, these electric cars have ameliorated the quality of air considering that they do not generate carbon dioxide. Furthermore, the majority of developed countries have a predisposition to convert thermal power plants into other stations run by alternative energy, such as solar power and tidal power owing to up-to-date technology. In light of the above, I find these more persuasive.
In conclusion, it is undeniable that there are a variety of opinions about this topic. However, after considering this matter in a careful manner, I fully support the view that the advancement of technology enables human beings to devise solutions to environmental issue for the reasons discussed above.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-08 | idid382021 | 89 | view |
| 2022-08-07 | idid382021 | 89 | view |
| 2022-08-06 | idid382021 | 89 | view |
| 2022-08-03 | hellielts | 89 | view |
| 2021-10-21 | haohao | 73 | view |
- Q 19 Developing countries require help offered by international organizations to ensure healthy and sustainable development Some people think that financial aid is important Others believe that practical aid and advice is more important Discuss both these 89
- Q5 It is not necessary for people to travel to other places to learn about the culture We can learn as much as from books films and the Internet To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Q10 Developments in technology causes environmental problems Some people believe the solution in these problems is everyone accepts a simpler way of life while others say that technology can solve these problems Discuss both views and give your own opinio 89
- Q1 Some people think that the best way to reduce time spent in travelling to work is to replace parks and gardens close to the city centre with apartment buildings for commuters but others disagree Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- Q16 Research says more and more business training and business meeting are taking place online Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 178, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...haps the most compelling reason is that a large number of companies invest vast sums of money in ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 306, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...enewable energy, including electricity, so as to lessen environmental degradation. As an...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 939, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he above, I find these more persuasive. In conclusion, it is undeniable that the...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 127, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a careful manner" with adverb for "careful"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... However, after considering this matter in a careful manner, I fully support the view that the adva...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, so, well, while, as to, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 41.998997996 157% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2049.0 1615.20841683 127% => OK
No of words: 385.0 315.596192385 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32207792208 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4296068528 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0499811291 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 242.0 176.041082164 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628571428571 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 671.4 506.74238477 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.184146483 49.4020404114 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.529411765 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6470588235 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.23529411765 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248639995296 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0697053972867 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0541634642325 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137157560215 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0259393823582 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.77 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 78.4519038076 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 178, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...haps the most compelling reason is that a large number of companies invest vast sums of money in ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 306, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...enewable energy, including electricity, so as to lessen environmental degradation. As an...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 939, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he above, I find these more persuasive. In conclusion, it is undeniable that the...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 127, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a careful manner" with adverb for "careful"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... However, after considering this matter in a careful manner, I fully support the view that the adva...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, so, well, while, as to, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 41.998997996 157% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2049.0 1615.20841683 127% => OK
No of words: 385.0 315.596192385 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32207792208 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4296068528 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0499811291 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 242.0 176.041082164 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628571428571 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 671.4 506.74238477 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.184146483 49.4020404114 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.529411765 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6470588235 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.23529411765 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248639995296 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0697053972867 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0541634642325 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137157560215 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0259393823582 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.77 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 78.4519038076 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.