Car ownership has increased so rapidly over the past thirty years that many cities in the world are now "one big traffic jam".
How true do you think this statement is?
What measures can governments take to discourage people from using their car?
In the age of development, cars have become easier and more common for humans to own resulting in the issue of congestion in different areas around the world for three decades. To some extent, this statement has already been verified in real life and this essay will discuss this problem. Besides, some suggestions will be proposed to governments in order to reduce the number of ownership.
It is true to say that the number of vehicle ownerships directly relates to traffic volume on the street and this can be the main cause for the traffic jams occurring in many cities. For thirty years, cities have been ideal areas for constructing buildings where they can be used to be offices for various famous businesses, so there are numerous cars used in the urban areas due to the nature of work. Most office workers, nowadays, buy their own cars with the view to freedom of commuting and expressing their social positions, therefore, leading to the rapid increase in the number of vehicles on the road.
Furthermore, heavy congestion happens mostly because of the awareness of the majority who use their private vehicle when some car owners might have the perception of not adhering to traffic rules. Their behaviour is expressed through their actions, such as: encroaching on the lane and crossing red light, which negatively influence other participation on the road. As a result, if everyone keeps their wrong attitude when participating in traffic, it is inevitable that the issue of traffic jams has become inferior.
In conclusion, in order to resolve this problem, the government should encourage residents to use public transportations like buses or taxis instead of their private car so that the traffic jam issue can be reduced significantly because of the ownership reduction. However, using public vehicles might bring them inconvenience, so these kinds of transportation should be developed to help people have excellent experiences when they use public vehicles.
- The Internet is a great course of information and has opened up opportunities or people to learn all over the world Is all information reliable on the Internet What could be done to control information online 61
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian man and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 78
- Discuss the causes and the effects of widespread drug use by young people in modern society Make any recoomendations you feel are neccesary to help fight youth drug abuse 73
- Topic In the modern world it is no longer necessary to use animals as food or to use animal products for example clothing and medicines To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Task 2 Some people think that it is more beneficial to take part in sports which are played in teams like football while other people think that taking part in individual sports like tennis or swimming is better Discuss both views and give your own opinio 82
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 519, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ue of traffic jams has become inferior. In conclusion, in order to resolve this ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, as for, in conclusion, such as, as a result, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1665.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17080745342 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80736581241 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580745341615 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 44.2621790682 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.363636364 106.682146367 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.2727272727 20.7667163134 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.54545454545 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265079198806 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0978720087372 0.084324248473 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0468872375244 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154417051023 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0418732289284 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 50.2224549098 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.3 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.54 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.