Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people. Why is this the case, and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places?
Several museums and historical sites seem to be attractive to tourists rather than locals. This essay will discuss some reasons why this is occurring, and effective solutions should be proposed to attract more locals.
Several factors are contributing to lower numbers of residents visiting museums and historical sites. Firstly, since local people may have a good understanding of their own culture and history, they do not need to visit such places. In contrast, because tourists are likely to be curious about a new place, museums and historical sites are good destinations for them to learn more about this place. Secondly, as historical places and museums seem to be boring to local people, these people prefer entertainment places such as cinemas and theatres. Meanwhile, travelers tend to visit special places such as museums or historical sites rather than these common places that their country also has.
Several actions need to be taken to encourage local people to visit their own museums and historical sites. First, visiting these sites should be included in the school curriculum when teaching local history. This can create more chances for students to go to these places. Furthermore, historical sites and museums should have more new documentary movies or different exhibitions to attract local people to visit more often. Finally, the government should introduce a special entry fee for locals to encourage them to go to such places.
In conclusion, tourists indeed have more interest in visiting museums and historical areas than residents. However, some measures can be taken to solve this issue.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-06 | Tấn Quý | 30 | view |
| 2024-11-02 | thaotanya | 67 | view |
| 2024-07-28 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
| 2023-09-27 | Chau Anaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaâ | 84 | view |
| 2023-01-25 | Nguyen Ho Khanh Duy | 73 | view |
- High technology is now being harnessed to help the elderly by providing monitoring tracking and perhaps one day robots as companions While there are obvious benefits for the elderly in these developments some people are uneasy about the consequences Discu 72
- The number of elderly people in the world is increasing What do you think are the positive and negative effects of this trend 73
- Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good member of society. Others, however, believe that school is the place to learn this.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 89
- More and more city workers are deciding to live in the country and travel into work every day The result is increased traffic congestion and damage to the environment What measures do you think could be taken to encourage people not to travel such long di 67
- Nowadays, more and more people decide to have children later in their life. What are the reasons? What are the effects on society and family life? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 252, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'older' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: older
...e nursing homes should be built so that more older people could live there instead of stay...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1470.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17605633803 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6132359599 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.573943661972 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 463.5 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.8917686452 49.4020404114 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 86.4705882353 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7058823529 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.70588235294 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279751691321 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0897096858296 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0874153280748 0.0667982634062 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211026509564 0.151304729494 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.071466080644 0.056905535591 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.