Studying with a group of students in a classroom is more beneficial than learning online at home.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There can be no doubt that the topic of study format deserves some analysis. This writer completely advocates the idea that studying in the classroom offers more benefits than learning digitally. This essay will substantiate the writer's position by elaborating on three main points: knowledge accumulation, interaction and social bonds.
Firstly, in-person classrooms help students receive knowledge better. If they participate in online classes with all the home comforts in their bedroom, they are likely to shift their attention constantly by various electronic devices and applications. However, this can be avoided by engaging in a formal setting of the classroom wherein the teacher's presence will force the students to pay full attention to the lectures. Moreover, in case the students fall behind with any lesson section, they can immediately catch up by asking the teacher directly. As a result, the class quality will be enhanced significantly.
Secondly, physical classrooms allow more interaction. It is understandable that myriad class activities, ranging from teamwork to group presentation, are restricted by the online format. Only by studying in person are those activities executed. It would not only make the lessons more engaging but also provide a chance for students to develop their social skills, which put them at an advantage when pursuing their future careers. To exemplify, by engaging in a group presentation, which is only possible in physical classrooms, students can practice various professional and social skills, namely negotiating, team leading, and problem-solving.
Last but not least, students can develop bonds with their classmates. By going to school, not only do students partake in-class lessons but also club meetings, catching up with friends and doing the aforementioned activities, to name a few. Consequently, they will receive ample chances to extend their social circles and nurture relationships.
It can be seen that in-person classrooms help students learn better, interact more and improve relationships. To conclude, this writer believes that studying with a student group in a classroom is, indeed, more beneficial than learning digitally.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-17 | nhub2409785 | 56 | view |
| 2023-12-30 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
| 2023-09-08 | hinhin411 | 56 | view |
| 2023-08-16 | hunghoang | 61 | view |
| 2023-07-07 | quoctoan@ | 78 | view |
- Many people think that men should go out to work while woman s place is in the home To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Some people think books are losing importance as a source of information and entertainment 56
- Task 2 Studies suggest that many teenagers these days prefer socialising online to meeting one another in person Why do you think this is the case What measures could be taken to encourage teenagers to spend more time meeting one another in person 11
- In some cities and towns all over the world the high volume of traffic is a problem What are the causes of this and what action can be taken to solve the problem 56
- Many people say that globalisation and the growing number of multinational companies have a negative effect on the environment To what extent do you agree or disagree 91
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 344, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
...al setting of the classroom wherein the teachers presence will force the students to pay...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 62, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
...n-person classrooms help students learn better, interact more and improve relationship...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, no doubt, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1882.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.68580060423 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.048226084 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580060422961 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 558.0 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.4644772545 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.555555556 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3888888889 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.94444444444 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284758024054 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0892419914152 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0829407335604 0.0667982634062 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168532259286 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0893326346445 0.056905535591 157% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.72 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 344, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
...al setting of the classroom wherein the teachers presence will force the students to pay...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 62, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
...n-person classrooms help students learn better, interact more and improve relationship...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, no doubt, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1882.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.68580060423 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.048226084 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580060422961 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 558.0 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.4644772545 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.555555556 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3888888889 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.94444444444 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284758024054 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0892419914152 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0829407335604 0.0667982634062 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168532259286 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0893326346445 0.056905535591 157% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.72 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.