Some countries are struggling with an increase in the rate of crime. Many people think that having more police on the streets is the only way to reduce crimes.
To what extent do you agree?
Public safety is a prime concern to numerous people. In response to the increasing quantity of crime occurrences, some feel the need for strengthened policing forces. However, I wholeheartedly disagree with this notion, believing that this is not the most ideal change we should seek, due to the potential efficiency and the presence of other effective and epoch-making measures.
While a crime profusion is a credible source of worry, upsizing police stations will cause more panic than solving them. For starters, most of the public distress nowadays is caused by minor offenses, such as the occasional mugging, petty thefts, or occurrences of similar fashion. The existing task force is adequate to deal with those incidents. Should we mobilize more officers, the effect could backfire and prompt fear mongers in the community, destabilizing an already trepid population. Fear breeds fear, and before long, conspiracies and uncontrollable rumors can instigate discord within communities. Instead, firm implementation of manual patrols and timely helplines could do better to ease the mind of the citizens. If the public feels protected and has their problems dealt with, the need for increased policing will then be subsided.
Another problem of increased police presence is the downsizing budget for other long-lasting and deep-rooted initiatives. Over-policing will generate extra spending, consequently forming a budget disparity for sectors such as education, rehabilitation, and drug-prevention programs. Evidently, in tackling crimes, nourishing the seedbed of a civilized society through education is a more everlasting alternative. Our job is to cultivate change, not react to them. Consequently, the extra body mass can only be there to prevent the situation in a short-term view, not to completely eradicate it. Fostering a well-nurtured society can motivate those in it to follow suit.
With such views in mind, public servants could better facilitate changes on a fundamental level by leveraging that wherewithal and allocate to better intervention programs. Brute force is the primitive way of dealing with this problem, thus must be innovated via education rather than erstwhile.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-20 | gianggiangvn | 89 | view |
| 2023-07-20 | gianggiangvn | 84 | view |
| 2023-02-19 | daidang869 | 84 | view |
| 2022-09-25 | Koi | 84 | view |
| 2022-09-25 | cleee | 73 | view |
- Task 2 Studies suggest that many teenagers these days prefer socialising online to meeting one another in person Why do you think this is the case What measures could be taken to encourage teenagers to spend more time meeting one another in person 11
- Education is not a luxury but a basic human right and as such should be free for everyone irrespective of personal wealth Do you agree or disagree 78
- Studies suggest that many teenagers these days prefer socializing online to meeting one another in person Why do you think this is the case What measures could be taken to encourage teenagers to spend more time meeting one another in person 84
- Studying with a group of students in a classroom is more beneficial than learning online at home To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Some people think books are losing importance as a source of information and entertainment 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, however, if, so, then, thus, well, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1868.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.6265060241 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15421709757 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.644578313253 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 583.2 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.7661200412 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.777777778 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4444444444 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 7.06120827912 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143187314719 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0393069432919 0.084324248473 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0429685281038 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0805264747153 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0277569289733 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.37 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.38 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 78.4519038076 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.