The world should have only one government rather than a national government for each country.
Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?
It is often discussed that global government is enough to rule out instead of a separate governing system in each country. However, this essay points out the detrimental effects of world government along with the positive impacts too.
To begin with, the advantage of single administration around the world is mainly equality in developments, financial distribution, employments, and travel and tourism. It would mitigate the discrimination between race, colour, language, and so on. People often feel togetherness and unity that would enhance the overall growth across the world. For instance, newly graduates to get a good job anywhere irrespective of national boundaries, trade and goods can carry to other regions without delaying border security checkups. Similarly, the economic distribution would enhance the advancement in roads and transportation facilities, technological development to the whole. A global government would inhibit the crimes and military problems by improving enforcement and legislation around the world equally.
Nevertheless, it would be more difficult to be practical to manage all nations together due to the facts of cultural diversity, and linguistic division. Most of the nations have their own ancestral beliefs and ideas in various lifestyles. Such things might be extinct due to the impacts of the global governing system. Likewise, it may feel difficult to many people to cope with the various legislations other than their genetics. For example, many Arab countries are still relaid their traditional clothes and culture in their parliamentary functions. Furthermore, language would be a barrier to conveying innovative ideas and establishing if there is no national government. In addition, it would be riskier for the global government to catch up on the problems and needs of people and to tackle the issues to the core.
To conclude, there are many benefits to having a single government in the whole world though, the applications and advantages would be less compared to the individual governing bodies in each nation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-30 | dinhphuonglinh | 89 | view |
| 2021-11-13 | eyraen | 84 | view |
| 2021-11-03 | tahmeed1993 | 89 | view |
| 2021-09-28 | eyraen | 78 | view |
| 2021-09-28 | minhpn | 87 | view |
- It is neither possible nor useful for a country to provide university places for a high proportion of young people. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- Some people think it is more important for government to spend public money on promoting healthy lifestyle in order to prevent illness than to spend it on the treatment of people who are already ill. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- The pie chart below shows the percentage of water use in different sectors in Sydney Australia in 1987 and 2007
- In many countries, plastic bags are one of the main sources of damage to the environment, and so they should be banned.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- Frequency of Eating at Fast Food Restaurants in the USA The bar chart provides information about how often people in the USA spent ate fast food from 2003 to 2013 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, likewise, may, nevertheless, similarly, so, still, for example, for instance, in addition, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1758.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54574132492 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09636516521 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583596214511 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 541.8 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.1933267429 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.875 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8125 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.4375 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252656958036 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0774209163172 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0683103532566 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178040687577 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.068685464286 0.056905535591 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.91 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.