In developing countries, children in rural communities have less access to education. Some people believe that the problem can be solved by providing more schools and teachers, while others think that the problem can be solved by providing computers and Internet access. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
There is a concerning problem in certain developing countries, whose children living in the countryside have less opportunities to acquire education. Opinion diverges on whether providing computers and internet access is the most effective solution in lieu of offering teachers and schools. Although this sentiment is justifiable to some extent, I am at loggerheads owing to a handful of rational reasons.
Admittedly, computers along with internet-based platforms are time saving and affordable approaches to bring reference resources to remote areas. Instead of financing a huge amount of time and money on transportation expenditure as well as building a library to store books which need to be up to date continuously, offering machines and cyber space tools should be considered a long-term and money, time-saving solution. Obviously, on no account does the far away location hinder rural students from accessing abundant information with the availability of the internet and computers as before.
By contrast, I express my strong support to the stance that investing in schools and teachers seems to overshadow that in e-learning facilities in light of numerous benefits. First, an attractive environment as a motivation for children to frequent schools is attributed to this practice. From a child's perspective, going to school and interacting with a real teacher is more appealing now that in the process of giving a lecture, teachers show their wide array of facial expressions in conjunction with body language attracting listeners, which “the machines” as a computer can not perform. Except for learning, schools are considered an interesting destination where children can experience happy playful time with their classmates. Second, a teacher can offer their pupils support that they can not deal with the computers by themselves. To be more accurate, children as well as their parents often living under poverty in an isolated region do not have a wealth of opportunities to approach the electronic devices because of its exorbitant prices. As a result, rural students can not manage to explore the computer functions for searching information without an instructor. Conversely, no matter with or without a computer, a teacher can basically provide acquaintance for their learners.
By way of conclusion, notwithstanding the benefits of online education, I ascertain that traditional classes with the appearance of teachers can not be substituted.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-01 | thiensang2007 | 56 | view |
| 2021-12-03 | kevann | 89 | view |
| 2021-09-28 | IELTS learner from VIETNAM | 73 | view |
| 2021-08-13 | Cellie | 67 | view |
| 2021-08-01 | phg_phg | 89 | view |
- More and more people decide to eat healthy food and exercise regularly What are the reasons for this trend What can be done to encourage more people to eat healthier and exercise 89
- The diagram shows how ketchup is made 78
- The map shows how coastal land develops into a coastal park 78
- The line graph illustrates the amount of spreads consumed from 1981 to 2007 in grams 89
- What are the advantages of learning English in an English speaking country 68
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 110, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun opportunities is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...children living in the countryside have less opportunities to acquire education. Opi...
^^^^
Line 4, column 89, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ts of online education, I ascertain that traditional classes with the appearance ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, first, if, second, so, well, except for, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 41.998997996 148% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2092.0 1615.20841683 130% => OK
No of words: 377.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54907161804 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4064143971 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21874299722 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 176.041082164 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594164456233 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 648.0 506.74238477 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.158804124 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.466666667 106.682146367 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1333333333 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265906895813 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0840793627745 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0402134337386 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143547974198 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0516408607985 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.0946893788 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.21 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.24 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 78.4519038076 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 110, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun opportunities is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...children living in the countryside have less opportunities to acquire education. Opi...
^^^^
Line 4, column 89, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ts of online education, I ascertain that traditional classes with the appearance ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, first, if, second, so, well, except for, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 41.998997996 148% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2092.0 1615.20841683 130% => OK
No of words: 377.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54907161804 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4064143971 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21874299722 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 176.041082164 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594164456233 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 648.0 506.74238477 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.158804124 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.466666667 106.682146367 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1333333333 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265906895813 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0840793627745 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0402134337386 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143547974198 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0516408607985 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.0946893788 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.21 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.24 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 78.4519038076 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.