The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010.
Summarize the information by selectin and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
Shown is the bar chart delineating the proportion of British donors categorized in five distinct age groups in two discrete years: 1990 and 2010.
It is perceptible that the percentage of people giving money in the age groups under 50 years old plunged over the years except for the over-50s. Moreover, the percentage of the 51 to 65s was reported the most in the later year while the reverse was true for the age group of 18 to 25.
In the 1990s, the rate of people aged 36 to 50 donated to charity accounted for 42%, which was the highest percentage, followed by those from 51 to 65 and over 65 with 35% and 32% respectively. By contrast, only 18% of young people from 18 to 25 making donation was less than that of the age range of 26 to 35 by 13%.
After 20 years, the proportion of people from 51 to 65 years old giving money nudged slightly with 39% reported; a similar pattern was documented in the oldest age range with 35% which was also the figure of the 36 to 50-year-olds due to a plunge in size. Meanwhile, the year 2010 witnessed a diminution in the rate of people donating to 24% of the 26 to 35s and 7% of the youngest.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-09-10 | kavi jk | 59 | view |
| 2022-08-24 | Nguyen Thi Thanh Xuan | 61 | view |
| 2022-05-06 | MiaPhan_09 | 67 | view |
| 2022-01-08 | Simon31 | 61 | view |
| 2022-01-08 | kevann | 73 | view |
- The chart below shows the percentages of males and females with higher education qualifications in 5 countries in 2001 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The graphs show changes in the trends of the urban and rural population and by different age groups from 1950 to 2040 67
- The graph below shows a typical American and a Japanese office Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and comparisons where relevant 11
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The two maps below show an island before and after the construction of some tourist facilities Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- thi IELTS Writing Task 1 ng y 01 07 2021 Task 1 The table shows information about department stores and online stores in Australia in 2011 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 215, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... 32% respectively. By contrast, only 18% of young people from 18 to 25 making don...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, moreover, so, while, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 923.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 216.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.27314814815 4.92477711251 87% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49628925568 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.523148148148 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 262.8 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 43.8341028359 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.857142857 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.8571428571 22.9334400587 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.28571428571 5.23603664747 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246353055071 0.215688989381 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120093945692 0.103423049105 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0449287503967 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151306481273 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0436065071299 0.0819641961636 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 74.87 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.08 11.4140731707 71% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.