Some are of the opinion that people are naturally born as good leaders while others feel that leadership skills can be learned. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
It is asserted by a number of people that leadership skills belong to human instinct whereas critics say that this is the result of progressing and learning. I would concur with the later notion on the grounds that there are some aspects of leadership in which genetic traits are unable to intervene in.
For one thing, the progenies could inherit several characteristics from their parents to become a good leader. From a scientific perspective, the primitive cognitive system and preconception of the child are nurtured since formative years by parental bonds and will subconsciously be affected by both maternal and paternal intelligence and personality. In the context in which parents are leaders, as a result, when they are born, certain traits that have been instilled in their natural instincts will contribute to their further development of individuality. These kids with dynamic characteristics or autonomous and abstract thinking will likely to embark on the same path of being a leader like their parents.
For another, I still hold the view that leadership skills can be acquired through training and learning as these two factors lay a solid foundation of every true achievement. Yet, it is essential to instruct a child and gear him towards leading the others at an early age. Notwithstanding how good their parents are, having the right instruction is of crucial importance when environmental factors also contribute in shaping personality. For instance, kids could be educated at school about how to conduct a small event or festival under the supervision of the adults or to organize club activities and ensure the specific role of each member during the operation. Hence, during the process, it will foster in them the problem-solving abilities which genetic traits cannot be involved. Furthermore, criticism is an inevitable part which leaders will encounter and people have to be mentally stable to overcome such hardship, which could only be enhanced from previous failures when training.
To conclude, the view that genetic traits account for good leadership skills could be justified to some degree. Nonetheless, practicing is more important in determining one’s ability to shape the world.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-04 | thanh1927540 | 89 | view |
| 2022-07-08 | nhattram39 | 78 | view |
| 2022-03-01 | akorn99 | 61 | view |
| 2022-01-26 | sonnn | 95 | view |
| 2022-01-08 | Nguyễn Xuân Sơn | 84 | view |
- The world of work is changing rapidly and people cannot depend on the same job or the same conditions of work for life Discuss the possible causes for these changes and give your suggestions on how people should prepare for work in the future 89
- Information technology is changing many aspects of our lives and now dominates our home leisure and work activities To what extent do the benefits of information technology outweigh the disadvantages 89
- Many students find it difficult to pay attention at school What are the reasons for this What could be done to solve this problem 89
- Some people believe that no one should do the same job for all their working life Others argue that doing the same job brings advantages for individuals companies and society Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- Some people say that individuals who make a lot of money are the most successful Others think that those who contribute to society like scientists and teachers are more successful Discuss both sides and give your own opinion 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, if, nonetheless, so, still, whereas, for instance, as a result, for one thing
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1880.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 351.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35612535613 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00481617072 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595441595442 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 572.4 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 46.7870228825 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.285714286 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0714285714 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.71428571429 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189199358521 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0623717543637 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0520583358739 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116544946741 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0243237134778 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.