Studying with a group of students in a classroom is more beneficial than learning online at home.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is appreciated that studying with a student group at school is far more advantageous than online learning from home. From my perspective, I genuinely agree with this opinion. This essay would pen down valid justifications for my verdict.
Initially, I opine that learning online at home would exert pernicious impacts on students' physical health and mental health. This is mainly derived from the fact that in order to attend online classes, frequent and intensive exposure to electronic devices such as smartphones or computers is required. Consequently, students might suffer from being short-sighted, or even episodic blindness as for the harmfulness of blue light from digital devices. Also, online studying means no direct interactions, which can badly affect the friendship between students and their mental state. Should students could have learning experiences in an educational institution, these physical and mental problems might be curbed.
Moreover, I hold a strong belief that studying with a group of students in a classroom would do wonders for students in terms of boosting learning efficiency and developing social skills. Thanks to face-to-face conversations with counterparts and teachers, pupils can sharpen their communication skills. Besides, strict regulations can act as a deterrent to cheating and force students to focus on their studies. By contrast, when having online classes at home, students can do multi-tasking, such as playing games and learning simultaneously, which can lower their academic performance.
In conclusion, as for the aforementioned explanations, I concur that studying with a group of students in a classroom is more beneficial than learning online at home.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-17 | nhub2409785 | 56 | view |
| 2023-12-30 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
| 2023-09-08 | hinhin411 | 56 | view |
| 2023-08-16 | hunghoang | 61 | view |
| 2023-07-07 | quoctoan@ | 78 | view |
- It is often said that the subjects taught in schools are too academic in orientation and that it would be more useful for children to learn about practical matters such as home management work and interpersonal skills To what extent do you agree or disagr 73
- Some people believe that it is better to live and work in vertical cities Others however think that horizontal cities are better for living and working Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
- The influence of human beings on the world s ecosystem is leading to the extinction of species and loss of biodiversity What are the primary causes of the loss of biodiversity What solutions can you suggest 89
- For school children their teachers have more influence on their intelligence and social development than their parents To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- It is suggested that primary children should learn how to grow vegetables and keep animals Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, consequently, if, moreover, so, as for, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1462.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.64478764479 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17947045337 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.590733590734 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 424.8 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.9192761902 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.461538462 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9230769231 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.92307692308 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.399969845114 0.244688304435 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148213373468 0.084324248473 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.159208321263 0.0667982634062 238% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.300702486622 0.151304729494 199% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.139255308705 0.056905535591 245% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.43 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.