Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Watching television is bad for children. Use specific details and examples to support your answer.
Considering watching television (TV) as a bad thing for children, I am strongly inclined to take the opposite direction of this statement. Being one of the most proliferated psychological subjects for children’s growth, the main advantages of the television for children cannot be neglected. To elaborate more on the topic mentioned, the following reasons and examples will be presented.
First and foremost, watching television can be ascribed as an anodyne (remedy) for their irritable behaviors. It is undeniable that there is a causal relationship between the surprising potential of interesting TV programs on the one hand, and their effective impact to prevent the incidence of possible abnormality on children’s behavior on the other hand. For example, the latest cartoon programs attract children exceptionally in a way that they spend remarkable time watching without any additional activity.
Another primary reason can be attributed to the crucial and complementary role of television to enhance the basic information of children in different fields. For instance, there are numerous programs (which try) trying to introduce the new technology and new lands worth visiting to children. Besides, some movies encourage children to learn a new language that can be denoted as an extraordinary advantage of television.
Aside from the points I made above, the positive educational aspect of television for the systematic children upbringing should not be neglected. As the current anthropology findings reveal, in addition to the attractive features of television programs for all children, there are plenty of useful programs which can teach the parents how to treat children efficiently. It goes without saying that parents get to watch these programs in conjunction with their children to make an essential family bond.
Taking all these perspectives into account, I cannot disagree more about the negative effects of watching television on children regarding the associated benefits of television to prevent the harmful behaviors, enhance the basic information of children and the level of the systematic children upbringing. To my best knowledge, however, watching television for a long time can be indicated as a disadvantage, the fundamental role of parents’ to control this harmful behavior can prevent further consequential disorders.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-12 | atefeh559@gmail.com | 73 | view |
| 2021-08-12 | amandeepkaurmaan | 61 | view |
| 2020-02-07 | Nguyễn Thị Minh Tâm | view | |
| 2020-02-06 | Nguyễn Thị Minh Tâm | view |
- People live longer today and so people should stay in the workforce longer To what extent do you agree or disagree 11
- some people think that rhe government should be responsible for crime prevention while others believe that it is the reponsibility of the individual protect themselves discuss both sides and give your opinion 56
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Watching television is bad for children Use specific details and examples to support your answer 73
- People live longer today and so people should stay in the workforce longer To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- People live longer today and so people should stay in the workforce longer To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, however, if, regarding, so, for example, for instance, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2002.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 355.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.63943661972 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16866476948 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549295774648 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 627.3 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.2121454923 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.0 106.682146367 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3571428571 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.57142857143 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252738263136 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0953977514676 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0482019859076 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151596761572 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.055155817891 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.0946893788 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 50.2224549098 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.73 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.