Parents should encourage children to spend less time studying and more time doing physical activities. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is argued that whether children should be motivated by their fathers and mothers, to get involved in more exercise in order to improve their physique, while cutting studying time. I somewhat agree with the opinion because it will bring many merits for kids if they can practice exercises more, albeit it is occasionally necessary for young learners to prioritize their study.
The first benefit of doing physical activities is that it would reduce the risks associated with children's general health when learning. This is because the nature of studying demands young students to sit and maintain their stance for a long period of time, which can deteriorate the spine's structure as well as place them at risk of cardiovascular diseases. By making their body move on purpose, children's muscles are increased, which decreases the constraints on spines and lessens chance of skeleton destruction. Likewise, children's blood pressure is reduced, thereby eliminating the risk of heart stroke.
Another gain for kids if increase their time to excersice is that their academic progression can be facilitated. It is proven that people's mental health correlates closely with their physical health. This means that physical activities not only benefit young people in terms of boosting stamina, endurance, flexibility but also stimulate the development of their brains. Given that young students' minds are fostered, they may find studying easier, thereby achieving better performance at school.
Admittedly, there are still occasions when investing in learning instead of doing exercise is more beneficial for young students. This is especially the case for those who are preparing for important exams, which require students' complete attention and effort. In this case, doing exercises in the meantime seems irrelevant. However, preparation for tests may be needed only for a few times a year, therefore the need for taking part in physical activities is still crucial.
In sum, if chidren can practice additonal physical activities, their potential health issues related to study can be ameliorated, and their academic achievement may be enhanced. However, if children are busy with their learning, they can save the activities for later. Thus, I partly agree with the view that children should do more activities in order to improve their physical well-being.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-14 | Lombardi Florentina | 56 | view |
| 2023-03-01 | Namnef | 56 | view |
| 2022-10-21 | Charles Le | 78 | view |
| 2022-10-20 | Charles Le | 84 | view |
| 2022-10-20 | Charles Le | 78 | view |
- Only reason to work hard is to earn money To what extent you do agree or disagree 78
- Some countries achieve international success by building specialized facilities to train top athletes instead of providing sports facilities that everyone can use Is it a positive or negative development 84
- Young people are often influenced in their behaviours and situations by others in the same age This is called peer pressure Do the disadvantages of peer pressure outweigh the advantages 84
- It is thought by some that life is better in a city Others however prefer life in the countryside Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- Although there is a lot of translation software available learning a language could still be advantageous To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 244, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...it and maintain their stance for a long period of time, which can deteriorate the spines struc...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, likewise, may, so, still, therefore, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2004.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 367.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46049046322 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74854770271 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564032697548 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 612.0 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.5023241105 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.882352941 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5882352941 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.70588235294 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204661572839 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.075897656723 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0634258841022 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125861205792 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0311110789287 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.