Some people think that art is an essential subject for children at school while others think it is a waste of time. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.
In recent years, the importance of art in school curricula has been gaining a great deal of attention to encourage creativity among children. Most importantly, the issue has become a bone contention among academic experts regarding its inclusion in the school syllabus. While some people consider it a wastage of time, I would contend that it should be considered a mandatory subject for a child at a certain level.
On the one hand, art inevitably promotes creativity. Children exposed to art-related activities such as drawing, crafting, painting and many more significantly develop cognitive functions such as thinking and analytical capability. Therefore, it could be a significant trigger to release the inner potentiality of children in their next period of life. An empirical survey conducted in the UK last year reflects the same notion. The surveys show that children who had art in their syllabus till 5th grade were 40% more creative in thinking than those involved in other issues rather than art. Hence, having art in the school curriculum might be an important initiative for the well-being of nations.
On the other hand, in this fiercely competitive arena, some people think that carrier oriented studies, namely Science, Maths and many more to be included only in the school syllabus. By studying such productive subjects, students will understand practical knowledge to beat the competition in the real world, which might play a vital role in having a suitable career in the future. Moreover, adding art to the syllabus will also burden their study load. The initiatives in Taiwan can exemplify this for the last few decades, where the government is subsidizing the educational cost by emphasizing productive knowledge only, which is reflected in Taiwan’s growth of GDP from 5% to 12% in the last five years. Hence, to them, having art as a school subject seems a waste of time.
In conclusion, people should not lessen the value of art should for the sake of a growing economy. I believe young aspirants should be kept from the regular rat race competition for their mental development. We can fortify Our next generation at a significant level by employing art and cultural activities at their initial age.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-15 | Uppal singh | 73 | view |
| 2022-11-03 | ashik031123 | 89 | view |
| 2022-04-08 | unknownabc | 73 | view |
| 2022-04-08 | unknownabc | 73 | view |
| 2022-04-08 | unknownabc | 73 | view |
- Nowadays young people lack an understanding of how to manage their finances after they finish high school Explain why they do not know how to manage money and how this can be changed 78
- Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhere To what extent do you agree with this view 61
- Many Offenders commit more crime after serving the first punishments Why is this happening and what measures can be taken to tackle this problems 84
- Parents should spend more time with their children helping them with their homework Do you agree or disagree 73
- Many Offenders commit more crime after serving the first punishments Why is this happening and what measures can be taken to tackle this problems 89
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 222, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...their mental development. We can fortify Our next generation at a significant lev...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, well, while, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1868.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 364.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13186813187 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84255043648 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596153846154 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 583.2 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.6674889245 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.882352941 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4117647059 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.29411764706 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27595857793 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0814692209461 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0615386485252 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157438909201 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0331189362854 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 222, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...their mental development. We can fortify Our next generation at a significant lev...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, well, while, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1868.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 364.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13186813187 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84255043648 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596153846154 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 583.2 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.6674889245 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.882352941 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4117647059 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.29411764706 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27595857793 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0814692209461 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0615386485252 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157438909201 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0331189362854 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.