New technologies have changed the way children spend their free time. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
The proliferation of technological gadgets has altered what kind of activities is prioritized by the young generation in recent years. This essay attempts to shed light on both the merits and demerits of this phenomenon before concluding that the former is more significant.
On the one hand, the heavy use of high-tech devices by children is disadvantageous to some extent. First and foremost, this practice has various detrimental impacts on teenagers’ well-being. This is virtually due to the fact that the sedentary time that they spent sitting in front of computer screens could lead to adequate involvement in physical activities, thereby numerous lethal diseases, namely obesity and high blood pressure might be caused. Secondly, retaining exposure to explicit content from social networking sites without parental guidance could lead to hazardous consequences for the maturation of offspring. For example, it seems to be horrendously labored to constrain countless sexual videos and violent images which are censored to appear on Facebook, Tiktok, and Twitter, resulting in the imitation of adolescence, leading to their behaviors becoming more peculiar and erratic.
On the other hand, there are a host of compelling reasons as to why I am convinced that this trend could be beneficial to the young. Firstly, technological devices could bring them copious opportunities to broaden their horizon about the outside world. Specifically, Zoom can be seen as a prime example of this assertion. Billions of students in China are capable of studying and researching online throughout the Covid-19 pandemic, irrespective of geographical boundaries by virtue of being under the national lockdown. In addition, by using technological innovations feasibly, we could alleviate time-consuming tasks. For instance, instead of taking notes manually, Goodnote- an app that is installed by Apple, could be used as a conducive tool for school-goers to facilitate their academic performance.
In conclusion, while it is irrefutable that it is deleterious for the young to rely destructively on state-of-the-art gadgets, I would contend that the upsides which it offers are significantly more noteworthy.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-24 | linh allie | 89 | view |
| 2024-10-24 | linh allie | 84 | view |
| 2024-10-01 | tata | 11 | view |
| 2024-10-01 | tata | 11 | view |
| 2024-09-28 | tata | 56 | view |
- The top priority of businesses is making money and they do not need to have social responsibilities To what extent do you agree or disagree 11
- Some people say that too much attention and too many resources are given in the protection of wild animals and birds Do you agree and disagree about this option 73
- Fewer and fewer people walk on a daily basis What are the reasons and how to encourage them to spend their time walking 89
- Some people think that there should be some strict controls on noise Others think that they could just make as much noise as they want Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- New technologies have changed the way children spend their free time Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 32, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'hosts'?
Suggestion: hosts
...atic. On the other hand, there are a host of compelling reasons as to why I am co...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, well, while, as to, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1877.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.65361445783 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26043747571 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.647590361446 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 578.7 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.5128169928 49.4020404114 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.071428571 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7142857143 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2142857143 7.06120827912 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0766637868904 0.244688304435 31% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0268053440175 0.084324248473 32% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0332605371091 0.0667982634062 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0366000933974 0.151304729494 24% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0256523716318 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.79 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.06 8.58950901804 129% => OK
difficult_words: 132.0 78.4519038076 168% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.