understanding a culture of a geographical area

Essay topics:

understanding a culture of a geographical area

When we plan to study or understand something, it is very important to have a broad mindset and to use a variety of techniques that can help us to gain maximum knowledge and information about the same. Being stuck to any one type of approach such as observation-centric or interview-centric will keep us devoid of a range of information and will scope out our knowledge. Only by using the right tool at the right place can help we gain the right answer to our questions. While learning something even after the right approach, many other elements play an essential role like curiosity which can drive the person to reach maximum height. However, there are major gaps in the line of reasoning. The argument is rather unconvincing, given the obvious flaws in the logic.

Firstly, when we focus on understanding a culture of a geographical area which isn't a materialistic aspect, the interview-centric approach can definitely provide us answers to a few questions but, observation can provide a holistic view of the entire area. Many a time, we cannot express everything through an oral method. Many of the stuff we can understand only after observing and experiencing the true nature and company of the like-minded. I'll really like to suggest the author give it a thought and reconsider his approach, keeping in mind the nature of the study.

Also, a variety of factors influence us to select an appropriate approach such as the geographical area, population, literacy level, and even the climate can make a lot of difference in our thought. Moreover, it helps us in selecting the right tool by understanding the nitty-gritty of the situation. Even an important element that needs to be kept in mind is the way in which the people residing are comfortable communicating and expressing their views. Hurting any emotional or religious sentiments won't serve our purpose to learn and understand the culture. We need to become a part of their culture to understand an in-depth emotions attached to it.

In summary, the given argument falls short in many aspects. Thus, there are several glaring logical discrepancies in the given argument. Because the argument makes several unwarranted assumptions, it fails to make a convincing case that an interview-centric approach can provide better results than an observation centric approach.

Votes
Average: 5.9 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-10-05 titanite09 54 view
2024-07-28 qsdzlbnwtpzecdeugi 58 view
2024-04-09 guozhishan 58 view
2024-03-31 shahajan999 58 view
2024-03-31 rahatumar9072 83 view
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 160, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hniques that can help us to gain maximum knowledge and information about the same...
^^^
Line 2, column 58, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'anyone'?
Suggestion: anyone
...ormation about the same. Being stuck to any one type of approach such as observation-ce...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 165, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...entric will keep us devoid of a range of information and will scope out our knowl...
^^^
Line 3, column 161, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... answer to our questions. While learning something even after the right approach,...
^^^
Line 4, column 170, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...reach maximum height. However, there are major gaps in the line of reasoning. The...
^^^
Line 7, column 80, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
... a culture of a geographical area which isnt a materialistic aspect, the interview-c...
^^^^
Line 8, column 168, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hrough an oral method. Many of the stuff we can understand only after observing a...
^^^
Line 9, column 105, Rule ID: ILL_I_LL[1]
Message: Did you mean 'I'll'?
Suggestion: I'll
... nature and company of the like-minded. Ill really like to suggest the author give ...
^^^
Line 9, column 164, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...suggest the author give it a thought and reconsider his approach, keeping in mind...
^^^
Line 12, column 163, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...acy level, and even the climate can make a lot of difference in our thought. More...
^^^
Line 15, column 162, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... their culture to understand an in-depth emotions attached to it. In summary,...
^^^
Line 16, column 1, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'emotion'?
Suggestion: emotion
...eir culture to understand an in-depth emotions attached to it. In summary, the giv...
^^^^^^^^
Line 19, column 164, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tter results than an observation centric approach.
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, really, so, thus, while, in summary, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.6327345309 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.9520958084 93% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 11.1786427146 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 13.6137724551 59% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 28.8173652695 90% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 55.5748502994 95% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 16.3942115768 79% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1990.0 2260.96107784 88% => OK
No of words: 383.0 441.139720559 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19582245431 5.12650576532 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42384287591 4.56307096286 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16438099233 2.78398813304 114% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 204.123752495 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545691906005 0.468620217663 116% => OK
syllable_count: 617.4 705.55239521 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.96107784431 121% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.76447105788 57% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.70958083832 148% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 19.7664670659 91% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.8473053892 92% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.1373966747 57.8364921388 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.555555556 119.503703932 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2777777778 23.324526521 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.22222222222 5.70786347227 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 16.0 5.15768463074 310% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 13.0 5.25449101796 247% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.20758483034 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 6.88822355289 87% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.67664670659 86% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.426671689567 0.218282227539 195% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109150267179 0.0743258471296 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.155290001863 0.0701772020484 221% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120732731143 0.128457276422 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.141534980366 0.0628817314937 225% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 14.3799401198 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.3550499002 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.197005988 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.5979740519 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.32208582834 105% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 98.500998004 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 12.3882235529 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.1389221557 93% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.9071856287 118% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 10 2
No. of Sentences: 18 15
No. of Words: 386 350
No. of Characters: 1912 1500
No. of Different Words: 205 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.432 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.953 4.6
Word Length SD: 3.101 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 126 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 109 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 73 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 53 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 21.444 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 9.197 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.5 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.306 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.499 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.163 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5