Some people claim that public museums and art galleries will not be needed because people can see historical objects and works of arts by using a computer. Do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
In this modern era, information technology is constantly improving. Many individuals believe that many online sites have replaced the factors such as general museums as well as art libraries, and computers can provide historical objects on the internet. In my opinion, I agree that technological surroundings have changed the mindset of human beings.
First of all, one essential reason behind people choosing technological devices to see information is that time and money can be saved. Individuals can save their time and money by not traveling to museums and art galleries and also benefit people by not paying entry fees for acquiring knowledge.
For instance, Youtube is the most popular application for varieties of content and people can see videos of art pictures, and monuments on it.
Secondly, another prominent justification is that with advancements in technology, people can observe knowledge about artifacts comfortably from their homes. In addition, there are no crowds at home so, individuals can peacefully read the information about the objects and do other useful activities.
Finally, one more aspect is that individuals can read information from far countries and cultures. In other words, there are no boundaries to observing information about civilization and historical items. Moreover, this activity increases the percentage of visitors from other countries, and this will be a benefit to the founder nation. For example, Indian culture is popular in other nations so foreigners have been visiting. Hence, the economy of India will grow.
In recapitulation, online-based information is a great way to learn about historical works and objects. I deem that, this will not only help to see the information of such objects but also benefit the government of the particular country.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-27 | Dharti Patel | 67 | view |
| 2023-04-25 | jay1451 | 67 | view |
| 2021-10-07 | manhleliep | 89 | view |
- Some people claim that public museums and art galleries will not be needed because people can see historical objects and works of arts by using a computer Do you agree or disagree with this opinion 67
- The diagram presents the process of producing smoked fish Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Crime rates will fall as advances in technology make it easier to detect and prevent crimes To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- In some countries around the world men and women are having children late in life What do you think are the reasons for this Do the advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantages 73
- Many historical sites and museums are mainly visited by tourists not local people Why is this the case What can be done to attract local people to visit this historical sites and museums 67
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, hence, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, for example, for instance, in addition, such as, as well as, first of all, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1539.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49642857143 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04749604476 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.575 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.2906899313 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.6 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0 7.06120827912 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.291989894844 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0832075125677 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0498481028237 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139614972804 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0364978387372 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, hence, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, for example, for instance, in addition, such as, as well as, first of all, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1539.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49642857143 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04749604476 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.575 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.2906899313 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.6 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0 7.06120827912 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.291989894844 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0832075125677 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0498481028237 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139614972804 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0364978387372 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.