Young people today mostly learn by reading books or watching movies, rather than real-life experiences. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The learning approach of youngsters by books and movies or practical experiences is a major topic of concern these days. While some people believe that teenagers often learn by reading books or watching movies instead of practical experiences, I completely disagree with this point of view.
There are a number of unique characteristics of the Zoomers Generation (Gen Z) that support the argument of a better learning approach via practical skills. The first justification for my disagreement is that most of the Zoomers Generation tend to have a unique and bold perception in many fields, especially learning and action strategies, compared to previous generations. In particular, although the learning approach of teenagers might be depended on the person’s personality, they are almost considered as healthy young people who love to explore and learn new things. Accordingly, while some students have a desire for immersing themselves in thought-provoking books or movies, a number of youngsters would prefer to join in collective activities for learning to gain more insights. Moreover, with the continuous advancement of society, the demand of acumen and flexibility are more essential for young people’s career in addition to their academic performance. For example, many researchers have indicated that teenagers are showing positive signs in participating in more practical experiences than before, with the aim of accumulating skills, widening the circle of relationships as well as impressing employers.
Another reason for my argument is that due to modern living conditions, there are more and more programs organized by schools and professional organizations which stimulate the social skills of those youngsters these days. Indeed, as observed in recent years by both experts and parents, most schools organize a field trip for their students at least once during the school year. For instance, these practical activities could be visiting museums, zoos or even going on a picnic with team building games to enhance students’ knowledge and awareness about conservation of historical sites and endangered species. Similarly, some private education organizations also launch short-term summer camp study abroad trips with many gainful incentives and activities to attract affluent parents to register their children to enroll. Thus, it can be seen that access to real-life experiences in modern times would later benefit children’s creativity and communication skills directly contributing to their future career.
To conclude, I completely disagree that teenagers almost learn by reading books or watching movies instead of practical experiences due to two main aforementioned reasons.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-02 | thuthao2000 | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-26 | thuthao2000 | 89 | view |
| 2022-08-05 | unknownabc | 87 | view |
- Young people today mostly learn by reading books or watching movies rather than real life experiences To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Young people today mostly learn by reading books or watching movies rather than real life experiences To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Many students find it difficult to concentrate or pay attention in school What are the reasons What could be done to solve this problem 73
- Every government has a duty to provide free healthcare for its people What are the advantages and disadvantages of the government providing free healthcare 89
- Some people think that zoos are all cruel and should be closed down Others however believe that zoos can be useful in protecting wild animals Discuss both opinions and give your own opinion 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, if, moreover, similarly, so, thus, well, while, at least, for example, for instance, in addition, in particular, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2311.0 1615.20841683 143% => OK
No of words: 405.0 315.596192385 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.70617283951 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48604634366 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14400211133 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 176.041082164 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57037037037 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 700.2 506.74238477 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 34.733680649 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 165.071428571 106.682146367 155% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.9285714286 20.7667163134 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.06120827912 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197047591966 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0733613032165 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0724518044424 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157832037023 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0854246629859 0.056905535591 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.9 13.0946893788 152% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 50.2224549098 69% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.43 12.4159519038 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.9 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 78.4519038076 159% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.