Cyclists and car drivers sharing the same road cause some problems. What are the problems? What are the solutions?
In the world today, there are several problems when cars and cyclists share the same road. This essay will outline a number of reasons for this trend and a number of possible solutions to help tackle the issue.
To begin with, one of the main issues was a lack of awareness when joining the traffic. Car drivers are not always aware when cyclists accidentally share the same road, which leads to traffic jams. For instance, the drivers fail to notice the cyclist approaching from behind. The driver abruptly turns into the cyclist's path, causing a collision. The cyclist may suffer injuries, and both the cyclist and driver may experience shock and distress. On top of that, the speed between car and driver is always different. Cyclists generally travel at a low speed compared to cars, which are annoying to the driver and lead to aggressive behaviour. In specific circumstances, for example, if a car driver has a meeting and is extremely quick, there will be an accident if the driver speeds up and gets in the way of a cyclist. It causes undesirable consequences.
There are a number of viable solutions to help tackle this problem. Firstly, not only car drivers but also cyclists should learn traffic regulations. It supports those who promote mutual understanding and respect between two groups. The government also includes traffic rules into the course curriculum so that both students and teachers have enough knowledge about traffic regulations. Secondly, many transports reduce the speed and improve the infrastructure. Developing a dedicated cycling lane separated from vehicles can provide significant safety for cyclists. There should be penalties for vehicles that go in the wrong lane; it will reduce the number of accidents.
To sum up, there are main contributors to the problem, and several measures are suggested to put an end to the situation.
- Universities and colleges are now offering qualifications through distance learning from the Internet rather than teachers in the classroom Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 11
- The use of social media is replacing face to face interaction among many people in society Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 56
- The chart below shows information about fuel used in the transport sector in different countries in Europe compared to the EU average in 2009 and 2010 61
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in New Port city center from 2003 2012 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compa 78
- The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling centre from 2011 to 2015
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 312, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'cyclists'' or 'cyclist's'?
Suggestion: cyclists'; cyclist's
...ind. The driver abruptly turns into the cyclists path, causing a collision. The cyclist ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 130, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to traffic'
Suggestion: to traffic
... drivers but also cyclists should learn traffic regulations. It supports those who prom...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, to begin with, to sum up, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1568.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10749185668 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74992657167 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560260586319 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.0007790764 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.5263157895 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1578947368 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57894736842 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292871756569 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0912936233626 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0948967648411 0.0667982634062 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160604782927 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0796362480224 0.056905535591 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 312, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'cyclists'' or 'cyclist's'?
Suggestion: cyclists'; cyclist's
...ind. The driver abruptly turns into the cyclists path, causing a collision. The cyclist ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 130, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to traffic'
Suggestion: to traffic
... drivers but also cyclists should learn traffic regulations. It supports those who prom...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, to begin with, to sum up, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1568.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10749185668 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74992657167 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560260586319 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.0007790764 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.5263157895 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1578947368 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57894736842 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292871756569 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0912936233626 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0948967648411 0.0667982634062 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160604782927 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0796362480224 0.056905535591 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.