Cyclists and car drivers sharing the same road cause some problems. What are the problems? What are the solutions?
In many regions, it is very common to see bicycles and cars traversing in the same lane. This essay will discuss the detrimental effects of bicycle driving and the possible solutions to ameliorating these impacts.
The fact that car drivers and bikers share the same roadway while travelling leads to two main problems. Firstly, being more likely to have a collision when sharing the same lane leads to a higher mortality rate. Since cars are larger than bicycles, cyclists will be involved in a collision or possibly even more severely die. Secondly, it will be very inconvenient when two different directions share the same lane. For example, instead of running as fast as possible to a late appointment, cars have to slow down to give way to cyclists, which is inconvenient and causes traffic jams.
In order to deal with such problems, two solutions should be taken into consideration. Firstly, on roads for bicycles and cars to circulate at the same time, the authorities limit the maximum speed to 50 km/h to keep both of them safe. When running at such speed, the driver can avoid other people in the event of a collision, causing less damage to other people. Secondly, governments need to build dedicated lanes for each vehicle so that the speed of two vehicles does not disturb driving. For instance, in my city of Bien Hoa To ensure the safety of cyclists and cars, fences have been built to ease traffic when two lanes run in opposite directions and minimise accidents.
In conclusion, cycling is more likely to die than driving. To reduce car accidents, the government should build separate lanes, limit speed, and equip each citizen with knowledge.
- Cyclists and car drivers sharing the same road cause some problems What are the problems What are the solutions 56
- The bar shows the percentage of people going to the cinema in one European country on different days 11
- Some people think that young people should be required to do unpaid work helping people in the community Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 56
- The table below shows expenditures on advertising of four car companies in the UK in 2002 Press Renault Rover Types of advertising millions of dollars
- The bar chart shows the percentage of adults who were overweight or obese too fat or much too fat in one country from 1965 to 2015 The pie chart shows the proportion of adults who were overweight obese or severely obese in2015 Summarise the information by 67
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1387.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91843971631 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61144392131 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.58865248227 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 429.3 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.4934059245 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.0714285714 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1428571429 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.35714285714 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161149805659 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0568385055679 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0393325525034 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0887949419784 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0472689980545 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1387.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91843971631 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61144392131 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.58865248227 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 429.3 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.4934059245 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.0714285714 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1428571429 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.35714285714 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161149805659 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0568385055679 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0393325525034 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0887949419784 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0472689980545 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.