Nowadays, tourism has developed and contributed a significant portion of national income to its own country. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this development and give your own opinion.
In the modern world, it is apparent that tourism has grown rapidly and provided a considerable source of income for many countries around the world. In this essay, I will examine the upside and downside of this development, as well as my opinion that the latter outweighs the former.
On the plus side, tourism has brought about economic growth and promotion of a variety of cultures. As people visit an area, jobs in restaurants, shops, hotels,... emerge to cater to their needs. It follows therefore that unemployment is greatly reduced, especially in remote areas, which enhances both the locality’s economy and the living standard of its people. Moreover, there is no denying that travelers tend to seek new and unique experiences during their vacations, which makes it self-explanatory why regions with special cultural features should appeal to them. In effect, regions having unique traditions, cuisine and history will become popular not only nationwide, but also worldwide, together with the encouragement to preserve those distinctive qualities.
On the minus side, it is believed that this industry causes drawbacks that cannot be overlooked, some of which are environmental destruction and over-reliance on tourism. Indeed, a number of tourists litter at beauty spots, either deliberately or unwittingly, which spoils the beauty of such sites. As an illustration, it is common to see plastic waste lying alongside the sidewalks in Hanoi or floating on the surface of West Lake. Additionally, forests are cut down and altered with resorts, which leads to higher frequency and more immense damage of natural disasters. Another problem presented is lop-sided development, which means that some regions only focus on the tourism industry instead of other fields such as technology, education, etc.
In my judgment, the negative aspects have more far-reaching consequences in the long run. Destructive natural disasters, scattered rubbish and unbalanced development in fields other than tourism are likely to degrade the living standard of the local residents.
To summarize, I think that despite having some evident benefits, over-commercialization of tourism will undermine the quality of life because of damage caused to the environment lack of concern for other industries.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-20 | minhtrang2k9 | 11 | view |
| 2023-09-20 | minhtrang2k9 | 11 | view |
| 2023-09-20 | minhtrang2k9 | 11 | view |
| 2023-09-11 | tungta | 78 | view |
| 2023-09-11 | hiMn | 11 | view |
- Children today are too dependent on computers and electronic entertainment It would be better for them to be outside playing sports and taking part in more traditional pastimes than spending all day indoors Do you agree or disagree Write an essay of about 84
- Some people think that boys and girls should be educated in the same school Others however believe that girls achieve better results when educated in single sex schools Discuss both these views and give your opinion 78
- The advantages of travelling 11
- The advantages of travelling 11
- Many people suppose that teachers play an important role in education Do you agree or disagree 95
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 160, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...area, jobs in restaurants, shops, hotels,... emerge to cater to their needs. It fo...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, moreover, so, therefore, well, i think, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1949.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 352.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53693181818 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08953924985 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630681818182 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 609.3 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.8180674429 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.8125 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06120827912 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0897770934273 0.244688304435 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0254050316432 0.084324248473 30% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0315996757299 0.0667982634062 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0518338697677 0.151304729494 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0379465621877 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.2 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 78.4519038076 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.