Some people believe that professionals such as doctors and engineers should be required to work in the country where they did their training. Others believed they should be free to work in other countries.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Some people hold the view that certain professionals such as doctors or engineers must work in their country while opponents argue that people should be entitled to work wherever they want. I personally gravitate toward the latter and some reasons will be explained as follows.
On the one hand, doctors or engineers, these occupations play an indispensable role for the development and stability of their own country. That is to say, if the tendency of these people work abroad after being trained increase, their nation will definitely encounter a brain drain crisis since there are not enough professional workers to fulfill the demand of the whole country. This is the particular case for Vietnam, according to recent surveys, this country is experiencing lots of difficulties including lack of knowledged and skilled labour due to the insufficient mental workers.
On the other hand, some others assume that choosing their own working environment is a right of each people. I firmly concur with this opinion. This is because the working environment, and the income that these occupations vary amongst countríe and people have a claim to choose a right place to devote to their own personal development as well as future orientation irrespective of geographical boundaries as long as they are qualified enough. Otherwise, it would be a substantial financial disadvantage for the individual. Moreover, engineers, especially who are talented, should have opportunities to work in a developed nation, where they are appreciated, where there are adequate conditions like modern equipment and infrastructures, thereby fully revealing their potential. For instance, a study conducted by Stanford university showed that in the UK, there are thousands of impressive architectures designed by people from different origins, who were trained in different nations but chose the UK as a place to fulfill their ambitions and reach their maximum potential.
In conclusion, although there could be the imbalance of labour in some nations, I agree that it is individual’s right to work wherever that please trumps any nationalistics considerations.
- Some people do not go directly to college but travel or work for a short time Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 11
- Some people do not go directly to college but travel or work for a short time Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 11
- Some people believe that professionals such as doctors and engineers should be required to work in the country where they did their training Others believed they should be free to work in other countries Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- Some people think that it is more important to teach children the literature of their own country than in other countries Do you agree or disagree 89
- Some people do not go directly to university but travel or work for a short time Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 290, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...efinitely encounter a brain drain crisis since there are not enough professional ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, so, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as, on the other hand, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1819.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47891566265 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12764186485 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584337349398 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 565.2 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 84.2919859114 49.4020404114 171% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.583333333 106.682146367 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.6666666667 20.7667163134 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.91666666667 7.06120827912 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.344352663394 0.244688304435 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114752426218 0.084324248473 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107090244375 0.0667982634062 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206801997079 0.151304729494 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116887168158 0.056905535591 205% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 13.0946893788 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.8 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.02 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.