Should the authorities from big cities around the world discourage citizens from using private cars and rather encourage them to use other means of transport such as bicycles, skates, the subway, etc.?
The civilized society is not just the one with its educated millennials but also the responsible citizens to minimize carbon footprint to prevent the Earth. With advent of technologies, there is a substantial increase in commuters using private cars than before. Though it is preferred for sophasticated travel or commuting, it has more disadvantages when it is not properly used. In this essay, the problems and solutions are discussed before arriving at the logical solution.
To begin with, in recent days, each family members from young adult to elders are using cars these days which became essential household in all the houses. For example, even a single person is using a single vehicle for comfort and luxury. This not only creates havocs in traffic congestion and nuisance to other fellow civilians sharing the public roads, but also increases the level of carbon footprint to the Earth's atmosphere.
Also, some of the rich spoiled teens are using the high end costly cars driving with high speed and creating more accidents that not only affects the victims but also the long lasting impacts for their family members.
To eradicate such issues, the legislative authorities of any country should bring strict laws to own only one private cars per family by implementing heavy road and vehicle tax for second car owners from the same family. This not only restricts to use them but also helps them to look for other alternatives such as public transport, two wheelers, bicycle that prevents much green emission to the environment.
To conclude, if policy makers encourage citizens with more benefits and concession for using other shared transport, it benefits both citizens and an evironment the the great extent. Hence, owning a single private car per family is the right approach to avoid all the above problems discussed.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-27 | Sridarani | 88 | view |
| 2019-11-12 | daniellima126 | 88 | view |
| 2019-01-24 | Agustinaac | 80 | view |
| 2019-01-23 | Sekhonsaab221@gmail.com | 75 | view |
| 2018-12-20 | prabhdyal | 44 | view |
- Some large factories are built near the communities What are the benefits and problems of this phenomenon 61
- What is your idea about lazy journalism that is commonplace in digitalized world? 11
- Should parents be held legally responsible for the actions of their children Do you agree with this opinion Support your position with your own study experience or observations 70
- People argue whether it is hard work or luck that contributes to success What is your opinion 55
- Do you think consumers should avoid over packaged products , or is it the responsibility of producers? 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 437, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the problems and solutions are discussed before arriving at the logical solution....
^^^
Line 9, column 162, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...enefits both citizens and an evironment the the great extent. Hence, owning a single pr...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 162, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...enefits both citizens and an evironment the the great extent. Hence, owning a single pr...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, look, second, so, for example, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 6.10837438424 16% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1547.0 1207.87684729 128% => OK
No of words: 300.0 242.827586207 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15666666667 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60371316051 2.71678728327 96% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 139.433497537 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606666666667 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 379.143842365 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.9966031354 50.4703680194 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.916666667 104.977214359 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 20.9669160288 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 7.25397266985 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234525812276 0.242375264174 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0780980815424 0.0925447433944 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0622761687825 0.071462118173 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128192840855 0.151781067708 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0687263935182 0.0609392437508 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 12.6369458128 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 53.1260098522 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.9458128079 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.5310837438 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.32886699507 114% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 55.0591133005 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.