To what extent is the use of animals in scientific research acceptable?
Many formerly incurable diseases nowadays have been resolved by the advancement of drugs industries. However, what is under the skin of these industries is the sacrifice of considerable number of animals in scientific studies, bringing a special concern from the animal lovers on whether we should keep using animals in such way. Nevertheless, some peoples do not accord with the animal lovers. In my opinion, the animal testings are unavoidable as long as the studies are used to save people or animal life. There are two points to shore up my view.
To begin with the drugs industries, the persuasive reason is that it is the only way to test the drugs properly prior to human trial. Without animal testings, it is too risky to directly test on humans. Even using the state-of-the-art computer simulation technology, the biological behavior cannot be guarantee unless using animals to obtain certain level of confidence. For example, heart disease is the primary killer disease to human. But now, specially thank to the drug industries to produce many new drugs for preventing heart disease, the number of people now died by this disease has been dramatically reduced.
Secondly, the scientific researches benefit not only on human beings, but also on animals itself. From the animal prospective, this is the scientific researches that allows us to have better understanding the animal biological behavior, thus providing a useful information for vets to cure the animals. In addition, the same information is also useful to scientist to find a way and save the animals from extinction. Taking Panda as an example, saving panda from extinction has been achieved by scientists because we can use the information obtained from scientific researches on pandas to reproduce the habitation and food to them. Conversely, without this information, this is certain to say that all pandas had been extincted.
All in all, the scientific researches on animals is vitally important, at least up to this moment, to save human beings as well as animals. Therefore, we should continue this approach until the computer simulation can completely and accurately simulate the biological behavior of living things.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-09-25 | elham mousavi | 78 | view |
| 2024-09-14 | elham mousavi | 61 | view |
| 2024-09-09 | elham mousavi | 61 | view |
| 2024-08-20 | Anmol Bal | 73 | view |
| 2024-08-14 | elham mousavi | 56 | view |
- Advances in technology and automation have reduced the need for manual labour. (opinion) Therefore, working hours should be reduced. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- Blood sports have become a hot topic for debate in recent years. As society develops it is increasingly seen as an uncivilized activity and cruel to the helpless animals that are killed. All blood sports should be banned. Discuss the main arguments for th 91
- Zoos are sometimes seen as necessary but not poor alternatives to a natural environment. Discuss some of the arguments for and/or against keeping animals in zoos. 84
- In the developed world, average life expectancy is increasing. What problems will this cause for individuals and society? Suggest some measures that could be taken to reduce the impact of ageing populations. 84
- University education should be free to everyone, regardless of income. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'conversely', 'however', 'if', 'nevertheless', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'therefore', 'thus', 'well', 'as to', 'at least', 'for example', 'in addition', 'as well as', 'in my opinion', 'to begin with']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.234096692112 0.247107183377 95% => OK
Verbs: 0.157760814249 0.155533422707 101% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0992366412214 0.0946595960268 105% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0737913486005 0.0501214627716 147% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0254452926209 0.0437548338989 58% => OK
Prepositions: 0.111959287532 0.122226691241 92% => OK
Participles: 0.0508905852417 0.0403226058552 126% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.90949601177 2.80594681477 104% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0483460559796 0.0326793684256 148% => OK
Particles: 0.00254452926209 0.00163938923432 155% => OK
Determiners: 0.10941475827 0.0861772015684 127% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0127226463104 0.021408717616 59% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00508905852417 0.011925033212 43% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2210.0 1933.35771543 114% => OK
No of words: 353.0 316.048096192 112% => OK
Chars per words: 6.26062322946 6.12580529183 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.20517956788 103% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.405099150142 0.374742101984 108% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.311614730878 0.28420135186 110% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.229461756374 0.203846283523 113% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.155807365439 0.137316102897 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90949601177 2.80594681477 104% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.037074148 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541076487252 0.56093040696 96% => OK
Word variations: 58.9180206377 60.7387585426 97% => OK
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0891783567 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.7647058824 20.7743622355 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.773392879 49.517814964 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.0 127.492653851 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7647058824 20.7743622355 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.11764705882 0.814263465372 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38877755511 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 3.99599198397 0% => OK
Readability: 51.9261789702 49.1944974215 106% => OK
Elegance: 1.54455445545 1.69124875643 91% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.426775777918 0.332605444948 128% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.141060657018 0.102741220458 137% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0927106646193 0.0668466124924 139% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.530186542235 0.534860350844 99% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.154020210875 0.148594505496 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.162025368016 0.134430193775 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0914205059733 0.0742795772207 123% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.434909741689 0.324371583561 134% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.019831123439 0.0638462369009 31% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.300498723443 0.228012699653 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0236643709019 0.058150111329 41% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.68436873747 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.41683366733 117% => OK
Positive topic words: 8.0 5.90881763527 135% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 2.5751503006 78% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 1.9629258517 102% => OK
Total topic words: 12.0 10.4468937876 115% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.