Some employers reward members of staff for their exceptional contribution to the company by giving them extra money. This practice can act as an incentive for some but may also have a negative impact on others. To what extent is this style of management effective? Are there better ways of encouraging employees to work hard?
Business success is a subject about which employers are concerned these days. In terms of this matter, employers go to the extra mile to motivate employees and allocate some rewards, like money, to the best one. Notwithstanding employers believe it is the best impetus, it has some disadvantages in my estimation.
Getting disappointed and losing confidence are some of its demerits which influence other employees. However, there are other kinds of reward motivating people as well. Getting disappointed is the first demerit of paying money to someone as a reward. There is no doubt that a team-work works jointly. Hence, when a person is chosen for extra money, others assume that they are disparaged and no one understands their attempts. In such circumstances, they are reluctant to continue their work eagerly. However, if the reason of allocating extra money to someone is explicit, others will perceive their own weakness and will admire their honourable colleague.
Another drawback of some encouragements like money is losing confidence. It does not take much common sense to find out a disappointed person doesn’t enjoy enough confidence to surmount problems. Based on immense explorations in the domain of psychology, 70% of employees who are working gloomily can’t make a correct decision, due to lack of confidence and self-esteem. They are always contemplating whether their boss likes their decision or suggestion or not!
Beside paying excess money as a reward, there are other kinds of encouragement which are less detrimental to others’ spirit. Granting promotion is one of the multitude solutions which can act as an incentive for some people. Not only does it represent the best employee’s competence, but also it provides circumstances which the best can guide others!
All in all, these days, companies’ developments have haunted employers dreams. Thus, they spare no effort to courage employees to do their best and they pay money as a reward. Unfortunately, these kinds of reward have reverse impact including getting disappointed and losing confidence- on others. As I stood before, there are various kinds of rewards such as granting promotion. These kinds of award enjoy less negative impact and courage others as well.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-14 | Sái Đức Lộc | 73 | view |
| 2019-04-20 | Arun rathour | 61 | view |
| 2018-08-18 | AhmedRaju | 73 | view |
| 2018-08-18 | AhmedRaju | 73 | view |
| 2018-08-04 | Ajay.dhariwal | 84 | view |
- Some people think that they can learn better by themselves than with a teacher. Which do you prefer use specific reason to develop your essay. 73
- Completing university education is thought by some to be the best way to get a good job. On the other hand other people think that getting experience and developing soft skills is more important.Discuss both side and give your opinion? 84
- Cities are now expanding; the government should make better network for public transport or should build more roads to facilitate car ownership? Agree or Disagree? 77
- Age discrimination occurs when a decision is made on the basis of a person’s age. In the workplace, these are most often decisions about being employed in the first place, winning promotions or being unfairly dismissed. Should discrimination against old 80
- Learning a new language at an early age is helpful for children. Is it more positive for their future aspect or have some adverse effects? Agree or disagree? 85
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'so', 'thus', 'well', 'no doubt', 'such as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.251798561151 0.247107183377 102% => OK
Verbs: 0.172661870504 0.155533422707 111% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0815347721823 0.0946595960268 86% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0479616306954 0.0501214627716 96% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0479616306954 0.0437548338989 110% => OK
Prepositions: 0.0887290167866 0.122226691241 73% => OK
Participles: 0.0503597122302 0.0403226058552 125% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.07220730681 2.80594681477 109% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0287769784173 0.0326793684256 88% => OK
Particles: 0.00239808153477 0.00163938923432 146% => OK
Determiners: 0.0815347721823 0.0861772015684 95% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0119904076739 0.021408717616 56% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0167865707434 0.011925033212 141% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2282.0 1933.35771543 118% => OK
No of words: 357.0 316.048096192 113% => OK
Chars per words: 6.39215686275 6.12580529183 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.20517956788 103% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.389355742297 0.374742101984 104% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.3081232493 0.28420135186 108% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.224089635854 0.203846283523 110% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.165266106443 0.137316102897 120% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07220730681 2.80594681477 109% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.037074148 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551820728291 0.56093040696 98% => OK
Word variations: 61.000872627 60.7387585426 100% => OK
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0891783567 137% => OK
Sentence length: 16.2272727273 20.7743622355 78% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.1369940215 49.517814964 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.727272727 127.492653851 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2272727273 20.7743622355 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.5 0.814263465372 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38877755511 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 3.99599198397 0% => OK
Readability: 47.0395976572 49.1944974215 96% => OK
Elegance: 1.45535714286 1.69124875643 86% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.370417360826 0.332605444948 111% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0899497180987 0.102741220458 88% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0517312553201 0.0668466124924 77% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.459719394358 0.534860350844 86% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.10825209667 0.148594505496 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119736808483 0.134430193775 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0699574321264 0.0742795772207 94% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.242630004186 0.324371583561 75% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0346140557369 0.0638462369009 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.228546665169 0.228012699653 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0294860836777 0.058150111329 51% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 8.68436873747 196% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.41683366733 0% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 13.0 5.90881763527 220% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 2.5751503006 116% => OK
Neutral topic words: 0.0 1.9629258517 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 16.0 10.4468937876 153% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.