Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
From a broad perspective, in the current state of affairs we face, in which so complicated is the relationships that the communication among people has entirely changed, it is not far-fetched to presume that families relations cannot be exceptioned() from this list. However, whether this complexity renders() the juvenils more independent is considered as a contentious issue. Thre is a growing segment of people who contend that youth were more reliyed on their parents previosuly. I personally concur with this idea, and in the insuing paragraph the rationale behind this statement will be further elaborated.
First and foremost, young people become more knwoledgable. There is no denying the fact that education plays paramount() role in order to develop the sense of independency(). Accroding to the latest research attributing to Dr. Kevin Rude, a prominent and highly respected professor in the Deprtament of Demography at the Macquarie University, the number of literate people has saored() dramatically. His probe revealed that peak educated people rate reached 65% in 2016 which had a 30% growth rather() than last decade. These figures provide further legitimacy in order to demonstrate that modern society witnessess well-informed citizens who incline to built their lives based on their abilities. Undoubtedly, having earned more knowledge, young people, as the next generation, learn how to decide on their own without relying on the parents.
Another vital point which should be taken into consideratin is that the structure of family has altered. Needless to say that in comparison() to the past, families are reluctant to live in and extended form. Actually, due to fierce inter-connected relationships within the family members, children were independence() to their family to a great extent. Inheritage() occupation is a obvious instance for this connection. As a matter of fact, if the family had not cooperate with each other, they would not survive and this story made them inseprable(). On the contrary, particularly in metropolises, juveniles opt to live far away from their parent and experience the world on their own point of view.
To wrap it up, it is more judicious to say that the more time passes, the more young people desire() to become independent. This issue occurs not only owing to increasing the level of wiseness and education, but also since the revolution in family stucture.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | nusybah | 80 | view |
| 2020-01-16 | 3dra | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-10 | Opak Pulup | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-10 | Opak Pulup | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-08 | naziii | 76 | view |
- As modern life become more complex, it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize. 76
- TPO10 - decreasing in otter population 90
- Agree or Disagree: In order for a business to succeed, it must put more money in advertising. 83
- Governments should pay more on computer technology or basic needs? 76
- A/D? Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 375, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... great extent. Inheritage occupation is a obvious instance for this connection. A...
^
Line 3, column 458, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'cooperated'.
Suggestion: cooperated
...a matter of fact, if the family had not cooperate with each other, they would not survive...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, however, if, so, well, as a matter of fact, on the contrary, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2022.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 382.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29319371728 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42095241839 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98809347449 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612565445026 0.524837075471 117% => OK
syllable_count: 642.6 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.3620604285 48.9658058833 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.333333333 100.406767564 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2222222222 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88888888889 5.45110844103 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165863408827 0.236089414692 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0491042864457 0.076458572812 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0419307503847 0.0737576698707 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0926309197146 0.150856017488 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0298960158583 0.0645574589148 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 11.7677419355 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 58.1214874552 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 10.9000537634 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.01818996416 120% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 86.8835125448 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 10.002688172 125% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.