Some people think that it is better for children to learn a foreign language at primary school. to what extent do you agree or disagree?
The phenomenon of learning a new language in an early stage of school and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. While contested by many that the ability to communicate by other nation’s people is highly rewarding and it could be started from primary school, such issue is regarded thoroughly constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I profoundly inclined to believe that it could be beneficial as an optional item in the children’s curriculum. This essay will examine both sides by providing some academic evidence before concluding.
On the one hand, from the educational standpoint, learning a new language is assumed as an advantage for children by scientists. Firstly, it could broaden their outlook on life by becoming familiar with other nation’s culture. Secondly, it could bring the society with some noticeable plus consequences while it will prepare young learners with a wide variety of useful knowledge. According to a survey conducted by the United Nation, children with the ability of speak in the second language, beside mother tongue, has more brain activities than their monolingual counterparts.
On the other hand, opponents argued that forcing young children to learn the foreign language may be a negative in some parts. They use a valid logic to support that it could lead to distraction from their fundamental courses such as mathematics and physics. Not to mention that it might be the reason of psychological pressure for some pupils. For instance, a scientific research conducted by Tehran University in 2015 has revealed that the ability to speak has slow growth in bilingual students.
To recapitulate, I pen down saying that although acquiring the capability of speak in another language may have some demerits, its beneficial impacts on youngsters in the forthcoming life far outweigh the disadvantages.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-09-22 | mirzaasif88 | 55 | view |
| 2018-07-11 | SB83 | 72 | view |
| 2018-04-21 | masi1397 | 80 | view |
| 2018-04-21 | masi1397 | 11 | view |
| 2018-03-20 | sasikumarkbt | 77 | view |
- Dangerous activities like extreme skiing, bungee jumping, etc. and whether you support them or not. 80
- Successful sports stars and glamorous film stars are a role model for youngsters. Do you support it or not? 11
- Whether experimental learning can work well in formal education, agree or disagree? 11
- Medical technology is responsible for a human's life expectancy. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 85
- Whether experimental learning can work well in formal education, agree or disagree?OrExperience is a more effective way to teach, compared to books? Agree or disagree. 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, while, for instance, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.5418719212 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 31.9359605911 144% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1605.0 1207.87684729 133% => OK
No of words: 297.0 242.827586207 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40404040404 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11732875276 2.71678728327 115% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 139.433497537 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582491582492 0.580463131201 100% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 379.143842365 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.982615195 50.4703680194 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.461538462 104.977214359 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8461538462 20.9669160288 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.69230769231 7.25397266985 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178045593494 0.242375264174 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0618442691941 0.0925447433944 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0530358542614 0.071462118173 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101677019702 0.151781067708 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0354905966826 0.0609392437508 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 12.6369458128 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 11.5310837438 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.78 8.32886699507 117% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 55.0591133005 173% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.